Observational studyJAMA internal medicine2017
Patient Mortality During Unannounced Accreditation Surveys at US Hospitals.
Observational study in JAMA internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of hospital accreditation on the quality of healthcare: a systematic literature review.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- Evaluating the Impact of Short-Notice Accreditation Assessment on Hospitals' Patient Safety and Quality Culture: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- The Impact of Disease-Specific Care Certification on Total Medical Costs for Joint Replacement Surgeries.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Association between hospital accreditation and healthcare providers' perceptions of patient safety culture: a longitudinal study in a healthcare network in Brazil.Israel journal of health policy research · 2025Article
- Observational
- Article
- Can Quality Improvement Methodologies Derived from Manufacturing Industry Improve Care in Cardiac Surgery? A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Complexity Bias in the Prevention of Iatrogenic Injury: Why Specific Harms May Inhibit Performance.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2022Article
- Assessment of Care Handoffs Among Hospitalist Physicians and 30-Day Mortality in Hospitalized Medicare Beneficiaries.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Association between Accreditation and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Major Cardiovascular Diseases in South Korean Hospitals: Pre-Post Accreditation Comparison.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Article
- Impact of disease-specific care certification on clinical outcome and healthcare performance of myocardial infarction in Taiwan.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2020Observational
- Association of residency work hour reform with long term quality and costs of care of US physicians: observational study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019Observational
- Short-notice (48 hours) ACCREDITATION trial in Australia: stakeholder perception of assessment thoroughness, resource requirements and workforce engagement.BMJ open quality · 2019Article
- Association between patient outcomes and accreditation in US hospitals: observational study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Observational
- Article
- Physicians' political preferences and the delivery of end of life care in the United States: retrospective observational study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Observational
- Large-Scale Evaluation of Quality of Care in 6 Countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia Using Clinical Performance and Value Vignettes.Global health, science and practice · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: In the United States, hospitals receive accreditation through unannounced on-site inspections (ie, surveys) by The Joint Commission (TJC), which are high-pressure periods to demonstrate compliance with best practices. No research has addressed whether the potential changes in behavior and heightened vigilance during a TJC survey are associated with changes in patient outcomes. Objective: To assess whether heightened vigilance during survey weeks is associated with improved patient outcomes compared with nonsurvey weeks, particularly in major teaching hospitals. Design, Setting, and Participants: Quasi-randomized analysis of Medicare admissions at 1984 surveyed hospitals from calendar year 2008 through 2012 in the period from 3 weeks before to 3 weeks after surveys. Outcomes between surveys and surrounding weeks were compared, adjusting for beneficiaries' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, with subanalyses for major teaching hospitals. Data analysis was conducted from January 1 to September 1, 2016. Exposures: Hospitalization during a TJC survey week vs nonsurvey weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were rates of Clostridium difficile infections, in-hospital cardiac arrest mortality, and Patient Safety Indicators (PSI) 90 and PSI 4 measure events. Results: The study sample included 244 787 and 1 462 339 admissions during survey and nonsurvey weeks with similar patient characteristics, reason for admission, and in-hospital procedures across both groups. There were 811 598 (55.5%) women in the nonsurvey weeks (mean [SD] age, 72.84 [14.5] years) and 135 857 (55.5%) in the survey weeks (age, 72.76 [14.5] years). Overall, there was a significant reversible decrease in 30-day mortality for admissions during survey (7.03%) vs nonsurvey weeks (7.21%) (adjusted difference, -0.12%; 95% CI, -0.22% to -0.01%). This observed decrease was larger than 99.5% of mortality changes among 1000 random permutations of hospital survey date combinations, suggesting that observed mortality changes were not attributable to chance alone. Observed mortality reductions were largest in major teaching hospitals, where mortality fell from 6.41% to 5.93% during survey weeks (adjusted difference, -0.38%; 95% CI, -0.74% to -0.03%), a 5.9% relative decrease. We observed no significant differences in admission volume, length of stay, or secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients admitted to hospitals during TJC survey weeks have significantly lower mortality than during nonsurvey weeks, particularly in major teaching hospitals. These results suggest that changes in practice occurring during periods of surveyor observation may meaningfully affect patient mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.