Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28319168›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Targeting chronic cardiac remodeling with cardiac progenitor cells in a murine model of ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Janine C Deddens, Dries A Feyen, Peter-Paul Zwetsloot, Maike A Brans, Sailay Siddiqi, Linda W van Laake, Pieter A Doevendans, Joost P Sluijter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janine C DeddensDepartment of Cardiology, Experimental Cardiology laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dries A FeyenDepartment of Cardiology, Experimental Cardiology laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter-Paul ZwetslootDepartment of Cardiology, Experimental Cardiology laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maike A BransDepartment of Cardiology, Experimental Cardiology laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sailay SiddiqiDepartment of Cardiology, Experimental Cardiology laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Linda W van LaakeDepartment of Cardiology, Experimental Cardiology laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pieter A DoevendansDepartment of Cardiology, Experimental Cardiology laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Joost P SluijterDepartment of Cardiology, Experimental Cardiology laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranslational failure for cardiovascular disease is a substantial problem involving both high research costs and an ongoing lack of novel treatment modalities. Despite the progress already made, cell therapy for chronic heart failure in the clinical setting is still hampered by poor translation. We used a murine model of chronic ischemia/reperfusion injury to examine the effect of minimally invasive application of cardiac progenitor cells (CPC) in cardiac remodeling and to improve clinical translation.

methods28 days after the induction of I/R injury, mice were randomized to receive either CPC (0.5 million) or vehicle by echo-guided intra-myocardial injection. To determine retention, CPC were localized in vivo by bioluminescence imaging (BLI) two days after injection. Cardiac function was assessed by 3D echocardiography and speckle tracking analysis to quantify left ventricular geometry and regional myocardial deformation.

resultsBLI demonstrated successful injection of CPC (18/23), which were mainly located along the needle track in the anterior/septal wall. Although CPC treatment did not result in overall restoration of cardiac function, a relative preservation of the left ventricular end-diastolic volume was observed at 4 weeks follow-up compared to vehicle control (+5.3 ± 2.1 μl vs. +10.8 ± 1.5 μl). This difference was reflected in an increased strain rate (+16%) in CPC treated mice.

conclusionsCPC transplantation can be adequately studied in chronic cardiac remodeling using this study set-up and by that provide a translatable murine model facilitating advances in research for new therapeutic approaches to ultimately improve therapy for chronic heart failure.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyDisease Models, AnimalHumansMaleMiceMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryMyocardiumStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID28319168
PMCPMC5358772
OpenAlexW2604031583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.