Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28318880›Full record

ArticleClinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))2017

Highly Conformal Craniospinal Radiotherapy Techniques Can Underdose the Cranial Clinical Target Volume if Leptomeningeal Extension through Skull Base Exit Foramina is not Contoured.

D J Noble, T Ajithkumar, J Lambert, I Gleeson, M V Williams, S J Jefferies

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D J NobleCancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: david.noble@addenbrookes.nhs.uk.
T AjithkumarDepartment of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
J LambertWest German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany.
I GleesonMedical Physics Department, Cambridge University Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
M V WilliamsDepartment of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
S J JefferiesDepartment of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBCancer Research UK · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCraniospinal irradiation (CSI) remains a crucial treatment for patients with medulloblastoma. There is uncertainty about how to manage meningeal surfaces and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that follows cranial nerves exiting skull base foramina. The purpose of this study was to assess plan quality and dose coverage of posterior cranial fossa foramina with both photon and proton therapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analysed the radiotherapy plans of seven patients treated with CSI for medulloblastoma and primitive neuro-ectodermal tumours and three with ependymoma (total n = 10). Four had been treated with a field-based technique and six with TomoTherapy™. The internal acoustic meatus (IAM), jugular foramen (JF) and hypoglossal canal (HC) were contoured and added to the original treatment clinical target volume (Plan_CTV) to create a Test_CTV. This was grown to a test planning target volume (Test_PTV) for comparison with a Plan_PTV. Using Plan_CTV and Plan_PTV, proton plans were generated for all 10 cases. The following dosimetry data were recorded: conformity (dice similarity coefficient) and homogeneity index (D

resultsProton and TomoTherapy™ plans were more conformal (0.87, 0.86) and homogeneous (0.07, 0.04) than field-photon plans (0.79, 0.17). However, field-photon plans covered the IAM, JF and HC PTVs better than proton plans (P = 0.002, 0.004, 0.003, respectively). TomoTherapy™ plans covered the IAM and JF better than proton plans (P = 0.000, 0.002, respectively) but the result for the HC was not significant. Adding foramen CTVs/PTVs made no difference for field plans. The mean D

conclusionsHighly conformal CSI techniques may underdose meninges and CSF in the dural reflections of posterior fossa cranial nerves unless these structures are specifically included in the CTV.

Indexed as

Cerebellar NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleProton TherapyRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedSkull BaseCraniospinal radiotherapyintensity-modulated radiotherapymedulloblastomaproton beam therapyradiotherapy planning

Identifiers

PMID28318880
PMCPMC5479365
OpenAlexW2597268199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.