Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28318651›Full record

ReviewTrends in ecology & evolution2017

Postmating Female Control: 20 Years of Cryptic Female Choice.

Renée C Firman, Clelia Gasparini, Mollie K Manier, Tommaso Pizzari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in ecology & evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Female genetic variation controlling timing of mating plug ejection inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Microbial Contributions to Primate Reproduction.Evolutionary anthropology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Sexual conflict as a constraint on asexual reproduction: an empirical review.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Diagnosing confounded Bateman gradients.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Renée C FirmanCentre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, Western Australia, 6009, Australia. Electronic address: renee.firman@uwa.edu.au.
Clelia GaspariniCentre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, Western Australia, 6009, Australia.
Mollie K ManierBiological Sciences, The George Washington University, 800 22nd St. NW Suite 6000, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Tommaso PizzariDepartment of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptic female choice (CFC) represents postmating intersexual selection arising from female-driven mechanisms at or after mating that bias sperm use and impact male paternity share. Although biologists began to study CFC relatively late, largely spurred by Eberhard's book published 20 years ago, the field has grown rapidly since then. Here, we review empirical progress to show that numerous female processes offer potential for CFC, from mating through to fertilization, although seldom has CFC been clearly demonstrated. We then evaluate functional implications, and argue that, under some conditions, CFC might have repercussions for female fitness, sexual conflict, and intersexual coevolution, with ramifications for related evolutionary phenomena, such as speciation. We conclude by identifying directions for future research in this rapidly growing field.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleGenetic FitnessMaleReproductionSpermatozoa

Identifiers

PMID28318651
PMCPMC5511330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.