Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28318287›Full record

Trial reportJournal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43)2017

Findings from a couple-based open trial for adult anorexia nervosa.

Donald H Baucom, Jennifer S Kirby, Melanie S Fischer, Brian R Baucom, Robert Hamer, Cynthia M Bulik

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recovery From Anorexia Nervosa: A Concept Analysis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Emerging Psychological Treatments in Eating Disorders.The Psychiatric clinics of North America · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donald H BaucomDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Jennifer S KirbyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Melanie S FischerDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Brian R BaucomDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah.
Robert HamerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Cynthia M BulikDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Enhancing Treatment for Adult Anorexia Nervosa with a Couple-Based ApproachR01MH093615 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BAUCOM, DONALD H, BULIK, CYNTHIA M · 2012 to 2016
$3.1M
UCAN: Uniting Couples (in the treatment of) Anorexia NervosaR01MH082732 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BAUCOM, DONALD H, BULIK, CYNTHIA M · 2007 to 2009
$919k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH082732NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult anorexia nervosa (AN) often is persistent, significantly erodes quality of life for both the patient and loved ones, and carries high medical and psychiatric comorbidity. Whereas individual psychotherapy for adult AN leads to improvement in some patients, recent findings indicate that the magnitude of improvement is limited: Only a small percentage of individuals fully recover and dropout rates are high. Thus, it is important to build upon current interventions to improve treatment response. We present results from an open trial of a couple-based intervention for adult anorexia nervosa as an adjunct treatment to standard multidisciplinary care. Twenty couples received treatment over approximately 26 weeks, including a couple-based intervention, individual CBT sessions, psychiatry visits for medication management, and nutritional counseling sessions. The results indicate that patients improved at posttest and 3-month follow-up on a variety of AN-related measures, anxiety and depression, and relationship adjustment. Partners also improved on anxiety, depression, and relationship adjustment. In an exploratory analysis, the multicomponent couple treatment intervention was benchmarked to well-conducted randomized controlled trials of individual therapy for AN; the couple intervention seems to compare favorably on AN-related measures and was associated with a lower dropout rate. In spite of methodological limitations, the findings suggest that including partners in the treatment of adult AN holds potential for bolstering treatment outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

SpousesAdultAnorexia NervosaCognitive Behavioral TherapyCouples TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28318287
PMCPMC5555805
OpenAlexW2601866518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.