Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28317947›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2017

Parietal operculum and motor cortex activities predict motor recovery in moderate to severe stroke.

Firdaus Fabrice Hannanu, Thomas A Zeffiro, Laurent Lamalle, Olivier Heck, Félix Renard, Antoine Thuriot, Alexandre Krainik, Marc Hommel, Olivier Detante, Assia Jaillard and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Network Reorganization for Neurophysiological and Behavioral Recovery Following Stroke.Central nervous system agents in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Rapid and Bihemispheric Reorganization of Neuronal Activity in Premotor Cortex after Brain Injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Firdaus Fabrice HannanuUnité IRM 3T-Recherche- UMS IRMaGe - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Grenoble Alpes, France; Laboratoire MATICE - Pôle Recherche - CHU Grenoble-Alpes, France.
Thomas A ZeffiroLaboratoire MATICE - Pôle Recherche - CHU Grenoble-Alpes, France; Neurometrika, Potomac, MD, United States.
Laurent LamalleUnité IRM 3T-Recherche- UMS IRMaGe - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Grenoble Alpes, France; IRMaGe - Inserm US-017, France; IRMaGe - CNRS UMS-3552, France; IRMaGe - Université Grenoble-Alpes -, France.
Olivier HeckNeuroradiologie et IRM-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble-Alpes, France; Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences (GIN) Inserm U836-UJF-CEA-CHU, France.
Félix RenardAGEIS, EA-UGA 7407 Université Grenoble Alpes, France.
Antoine ThuriotAGEIS, EA-UGA 7407 Université Grenoble Alpes, France; Unité neurovasculaire - CHU Grenoble-Alpes, France.
Alexandre KrainikUnité IRM 3T-Recherche- UMS IRMaGe - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Grenoble Alpes, France; IRMaGe - Inserm US-017, France; IRMaGe - CNRS UMS-3552, France; IRMaGe - Université Grenoble-Alpes -, France; Neuroradiologie et IRM-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble-Alpes, France; Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences (GIN) Inserm U836-UJF-CEA-CHU, France.
Marc HommelLaboratoire MATICE - Pôle Recherche - CHU Grenoble-Alpes, France; AGEIS, EA-UGA 7407 Université Grenoble Alpes, France; Clinatec - CHU Grenoble-Alpes, France.
Olivier DetanteLaboratoire MATICE - Pôle Recherche - CHU Grenoble-Alpes, France; Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences (GIN) Inserm U836-UJF-CEA-CHU, France; Unité neurovasculaire - CHU Grenoble-Alpes, France.
Assia JaillardUnité IRM 3T-Recherche- UMS IRMaGe - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Grenoble Alpes, France; Laboratoire MATICE - Pôle Recherche - CHU Grenoble-Alpes, France; AGEIS, EA-UGA 7407 Université Grenoble Alpes, France.
ISIS-HERMES Study Group
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre Hospitalier Métropole Savoie · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While motor recovery following mild stroke has been extensively studied with neuroimaging, mechanisms of recovery after moderate to severe strokes of the types that are often the focus for novel restorative therapies remain obscure. We used fMRI to: 1) characterize reorganization occurring after moderate to severe subacute stroke, 2) identify brain regions associated with motor recovery and 3) to test whether brain activity associated with passive movement measured in the subacute period could predict motor outcome six months later. Because many patients with large strokes involving sensorimotor regions cannot engage in voluntary movement, we used passive flexion-extension of the paretic wrist to compare 21 patients with subacute ischemic stroke to 24 healthy controls one month after stroke. Clinical motor outcome was assessed with Fugl-Meyer motor scores (motor-FMS) six months later. Multiple regression, with predictors including baseline (one-month) motor-FMS and sensorimotor network regional activity (ROI) measures, was used to determine optimal variable selection for motor outcome prediction. Sensorimotor network ROIs were derived from a meta-analysis of arm voluntary movement tasks. Bootstrapping with 1000 replications was used for internal model validation. During passive movement, both control and patient groups exhibited activity increases in multiple bilateral sensorimotor network regions, including the primary motor (MI), premotor and supplementary motor areas (SMA), cerebellar cortex, putamen, thalamus, insula, Brodmann area (BA) 44 and parietal operculum (OP1-OP4). Compared to controls, patients showed: 1) lower task-related activity in ipsilesional MI, SMA and contralesional cerebellum (lobules V-VI) and 2) higher activity in contralesional MI, superior temporal gyrus and OP1-OP4. Using multiple regression, we found that the combination of baseline motor-FMS, activity in ipsilesional MI (BA4a), putamen and ipsilesional OP1 predicted motor outcome measured 6 months later (adjusted-R

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexMovement DisordersOxygenParietal LobeRecovery of FunctionRegression AnalysisStrokeOxygen

Identifiers

PMID28317947
PMCPMC5342999
OpenAlexW2582719252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.