Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28317937›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Identification of cancer-associated missense mutations in hace1 that impair cell growth control and Rac1 ubiquitylation.

Emilie Andrio, Romain Lotte, Daniel Hamaoui, Jacqueline Cherfils, Anne Doye, Mads Daugaard, Poul H Sorensen, Frédéric Bost, Raymond Ruimy, Amel Mettouchi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Identification of a putative founder effect involving the HACE1:c.1396C>T variant in two Iranian families and review of reported cases.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Emilie AndrioInserm, U1065, C3M, Team Bacterial Toxins in Host-Pathogens Interactions France, Equipe labellisée la ligue contre le cancer, Nice 06204, France.
Romain LotteInserm, U1065, C3M, Team Bacterial Toxins in Host-Pathogens Interactions France, Equipe labellisée la ligue contre le cancer, Nice 06204, France.
Daniel HamaouiInserm, U1065, C3M, Team Bacterial Toxins in Host-Pathogens Interactions France, Equipe labellisée la ligue contre le cancer, Nice 06204, France.
Jacqueline CherfilsLaboratoire de Biologie et Pharmacologie Appliquée, CNRS et Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Cachan, France.
Anne DoyeInserm, U1065, C3M, Team Bacterial Toxins in Host-Pathogens Interactions France, Equipe labellisée la ligue contre le cancer, Nice 06204, France.
Mads DaugaardVancouver Prostate Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Poul H SorensenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Center, Vancouver, Canada.
Frédéric BostUniversité Nice Côte d'Azur, Inserm, C3M, France.
Raymond RuimyInserm, U1065, C3M, Team Bacterial Toxins in Host-Pathogens Interactions France, Equipe labellisée la ligue contre le cancer, Nice 06204, France.
Amel MettouchiInserm, U1065, C3M, Team Bacterial Toxins in Host-Pathogens Interactions France, Equipe labellisée la ligue contre le cancer, Nice 06204, France.
Emmanuel LemichezInserm, U1065, C3M, Team Bacterial Toxins in Host-Pathogens Interactions France, Equipe labellisée la ligue contre le cancer, Nice 06204, France.
Inserm · FRHôpital l'Archet · FRLaboratoire de Biologie et Pharmacologie Appliquée · FRUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The E3 ubiquitin ligase HACE1 is a potent tumor suppressor that controls cell proliferation and ubiquitylates the small GTPase Rac1 to target it to proteasomal degradation. Whether and how the activity of HACE1 is regulated by the N-terminal ankyrin (ANK) and the middle (MID) domains is ill defined. Here, we identified in the version 64 of the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) 13 missense mutations of hace1 located outside the HECT domain, and found that all lead to defective control of cell proliferation. In addition, several mutations located in the ankyrin domain displayed a dramatic reduction in Rac1 ubiquitylation associated with a decrease of colony formation in soft agar. 3D structure modelling of the 7 ankyrin-repeats coupled to functional analysis identified a surface epitope centered on one of the mutated residue, Gly-175, which is critical for controlling Rac1 binding and ubiquitylation. We also identified a role for the MID domain in conferring the specificity of association of HACE1 to the active form of Rac1. Our study of the functional interplay between HACE1 and Rac1 in cancer thus sheds a new light on the molecular mechanism of Rac1 ubiquitylation by HACE1 and the impact of its cancer-associated mutations in cell proliferation.

Indexed as

UbiquitinationAmino Acid SequenceCell LineCell ProliferationHumansModels, MolecularMutant ProteinsMutation, MissenseNeoplasmsProtein BindingProtein Domainsrac1 GTP-Binding ProteinStructure-Activity RelationshipUbiquitin-Protein LigasesHACE1 protein, humanMutant Proteinsrac1 GTP-Binding ProteinUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID28317937
PMCPMC5357957
OpenAlexW2599936639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.