Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28317912›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

The soft mechanical signature of glial scars in the central nervous system.

Emad Moeendarbary, Isabell P Weber, Graham K Sheridan, David E Koser, Sara Soleman, Barbara Haenzi, Elizabeth J Bradbury, James Fawcett, Kristian Franze

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 192 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
192citing papers in PubMed
19.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

192 citing papers in PubMed, 395 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Piezo1 induces Wnt7bTheranostics · 2026
    Article
  15. Regulatory T cells attenuate astrogliosis via IL-10/STAT3/PKC/vimentin signaling and promote neurological recovery after spinal cord injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

132 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emad MoeendarbaryDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK.
Isabell P WeberDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK.
Graham K SheridanDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK.
David E KoserDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6139-3096
Sara SolemanJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0PY, UK.
Barbara HaenziJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0PY, UK.
Elizabeth J BradburyWolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK.
James FawcettJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0PY, UK.
Kristian FranzeDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000864Medical Research Council G1002055Medical Research Council G1100312Medical Research Council MR/R004544/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injury to the central nervous system (CNS) alters the molecular and cellular composition of neural tissue and leads to glial scarring, which inhibits the regrowth of damaged axons. Mammalian glial scars supposedly form a chemical and mechanical barrier to neuronal regeneration. While tremendous effort has been devoted to identifying molecular characteristics of the scar, very little is known about its mechanical properties. Here we characterize spatiotemporal changes of the elastic stiffness of the injured rat neocortex and spinal cord at 1.5 and three weeks post-injury using atomic force microscopy. In contrast to scars in other mammalian tissues, CNS tissue significantly softens after injury. Expression levels of glial intermediate filaments (GFAP, vimentin) and extracellular matrix components (laminin, collagen IV) correlate with tissue softening. As tissue stiffness is a regulator of neuronal growth, our results may help to understand why mammalian neurons do not regenerate after injury.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationAnimalsCentral Nervous SystemCicatrixCollagen Type IVFemaleGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinLamininMicroscopy, Atomic ForceNeocortexNeurogliaNeuronsRatsSpinal CordVimentinCollagen Type IVGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinLamininVimentin

Identifiers

PMID28317912
PMCPMC5364386
OpenAlexW2602609341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.