Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28317264›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2017

A collection of enhancer trap insertional mutants for functional genomics in tomato.

Fernando Pérez-Martín, Fernando J Yuste-Lisbona, Benito Pineda, María Pilar Angarita-Díaz, Begoña García-Sogo, Teresa Antón, Sibilla Sánchez, Estela Giménez, Alejandro Atarés, Antonia Fernández-Lozano and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An enhancer trap system to track developmental dynamics in Marchantia polymorpha.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The TomatoFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Tomato Fruit Development and Metabolism.Frontiers in plant science · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fernando Pérez-MartínCentro de Investigación en Biotecnología Agroalimentaria (BITAL), Universidad de Almería, Almería, Spain.
Fernando J Yuste-LisbonaCentro de Investigación en Biotecnología Agroalimentaria (BITAL), Universidad de Almería, Almería, Spain.
Benito PinedaInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (UPV-CSIC), Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
María Pilar Angarita-DíazInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (UPV-CSIC), Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Begoña García-SogoInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (UPV-CSIC), Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Teresa AntónInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (UPV-CSIC), Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Sibilla SánchezInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (UPV-CSIC), Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Estela GiménezCentro de Investigación en Biotecnología Agroalimentaria (BITAL), Universidad de Almería, Almería, Spain.
Alejandro AtarésInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (UPV-CSIC), Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Antonia Fernández-LozanoCentro de Investigación en Biotecnología Agroalimentaria (BITAL), Universidad de Almería, Almería, Spain.
Ana Ortíz-AtienzaCentro de Investigación en Biotecnología Agroalimentaria (BITAL), Universidad de Almería, Almería, Spain.
Manuel García-AlcázarCentro de Investigación en Biotecnología Agroalimentaria (BITAL), Universidad de Almería, Almería, Spain.
Laura CastañedaCentro de Investigación en Biotecnología Agroalimentaria (BITAL), Universidad de Almería, Almería, Spain.
Rocío FonsecaCentro de Investigación en Biotecnología Agroalimentaria (BITAL), Universidad de Almería, Almería, Spain.
Carmen CapelCentro de Investigación en Biotecnología Agroalimentaria (BITAL), Universidad de Almería, Almería, Spain.
Geraldine GoergenInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (UPV-CSIC), Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Jorge SánchezInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (UPV-CSIC), Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Jorge L QuispeCentro de Investigación en Biotecnología Agroalimentaria (BITAL), Universidad de Almería, Almería, Spain.
Juan CapelCentro de Investigación en Biotecnología Agroalimentaria (BITAL), Universidad de Almería, Almería, Spain.
Trinidad AngostoCentro de Investigación en Biotecnología Agroalimentaria (BITAL), Universidad de Almería, Almería, Spain.
Vicente MorenoInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (UPV-CSIC), Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Rafael LozanoCentro de Investigación en Biotecnología Agroalimentaria (BITAL), Universidad de Almería, Almería, Spain.
University of Almería · ESInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas · ESUniversitat Politècnica de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the completion of genome sequencing projects, the next challenge is to close the gap between gene annotation and gene functional assignment. Genomic tools to identify gene functions are based on the analysis of phenotypic variations between a wild type and its mutant; hence, mutant collections are a valuable resource. In this sense, T-DNA collections allow for an easy and straightforward identification of the tagged gene, serving as the basis of both forward and reverse genetic strategies. This study reports on the phenotypic and molecular characterization of an enhancer trap T-DNA collection in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), which has been produced by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation using a binary vector bearing a minimal promoter fused to the uidA reporter gene. Two genes have been isolated from different T-DNA mutants, one of these genes codes for a UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase involved in programmed cell death and leaf development, which means a novel gene function reported in tomato. Together, our results support that enhancer trapping is a powerful tool to identify novel genes and regulatory elements in tomato and that this T-DNA mutant collection represents a highly valuable resource for functional analyses in this fleshy-fruited model species.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticAgrobacteriumBase SequenceChromosome MappingDNA, BacterialDNA, PlantFruitGene SilencingGenes, PlantGenes, ReporterGenomicsMutagenesis, InsertionalPhenotypePlant LeavesPromoter Regions, GeneticSolanum lycopersicumDNA, BacterialDNA, PlantT-DNAenhancer trappingfunctional genomicsGUS expressioninsertional mutagenesisSolanum lycopersicumT-DNA

Identifiers

PMID28317264
PMCPMC5633825
OpenAlexW2596244959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.