Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28316892›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2017

From big data to diagnosis and prognosis: gene expression signatures in liver hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hong Yang, Xin Zhang, Xiao-Yong Cai, Dong-Yue Wen, Zhi-Hua Ye, Liang Liang, Lu Zhang, Han-Lin Wang, Gang Chen, Zhen-Bo Feng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Prognostic Values ofJournal of Cancer · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hong Yang *Department of Ultrasonography, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Xin Zhang *Department of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Xiao-Yong CaiDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (West Branch), Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Dong-Yue WenDepartment of Ultrasonography, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Zhi-Hua YeDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Liang LiangDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (West Branch), Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Lu ZhangDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Han-Lin WangDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Gang ChenDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Zhen-Bo FengDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Guangxi Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver hepatocellular carcinoma accounts for the overwhelming majority of primary liver cancers and its belated diagnosis and poor prognosis call for novel biomarkers to be discovered, which, in the era of big data, innovative bioinformatics and computational techniques can prove to be highly helpful in.

methodsBig data aggregated from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Natural Language Processing were integrated to generate differentially expressed genes. Relevant signaling pathways of differentially expressed genes went through Gene Ontology enrichment analysis, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes and Panther pathway enrichment analysis and protein-protein interaction network. The pathway ranked high in the enrichment analysis was further investigated, and selected genes with top priority were evaluated and assessed in terms of their diagnostic and prognostic values.

resultsA list of 389 genes was generated by overlapping genes from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Natural Language Processing. Three pathways demonstrated top priorities, and the one with specific associations with cancers, 'pathways in cancer,' was analyzed with its four highlighted genes, namely, BIRC5, E2F1, CCNE1, and CDKN2A, which were validated using Oncomine. The detection pool composed of the four genes presented satisfactory diagnostic power with an outstanding integrated AUC of 0.990 (95% CI [0.982-0.998], DISCUSSION: The study illustrates liver hepatocellular carcinoma gene signatures, related pathways and networks from the perspective of big data, featuring the cancer-specific pathway with priority, 'pathways in cancer.' The detection pool of the four highlighted genes, namely BIRC5, E2F1, CCNE1 and CDKN2A, should be further investigated given its high evidence level of diagnosis, whereas the prognostic powers of BIRC5 and CCNE1 are equally attractive and worthy of attention.

Indexed as

BIRC5CCNE1CDKN2AE2F1Gene signaturesHepatocellular carcinomaNatural language processingOncominePathways in cancerTCGA

Identifiers

PMID28316892
PMCPMC5354077
OpenAlexW2596642692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.