Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28316235›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2017

Evaluation of Nanobody Conjugates and Protein Fusions as Bioanalytical Reagents.

Virginia J Bruce, Brian R McNaughton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in Nanobody-Based Platforms for Precision Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  2. Rapid Dot-Blot Immunoassay for Detecting MultipleJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Efficient Cloning of Inserts for Phage Display by Golden Gate Assembly.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  6. Overview of Rapid Detection Methods forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Exploring cellular biochemistry with nanobodies.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Virginia J BruceDepartment of Chemistry and ‡Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States.
Brian R McNaughtonDepartment of Chemistry and ‡Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5002-2262
Colorado State University · US

Funding

Identification of Protein Drug Leads That Address Challenges to Small Molecule CeR01GM107520 · NIGMS · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KENNAN, ALAN J · 2014 to 2018
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), flow cytometry, and Western blot are common bioanalytical techniques. Successful execution traditionally requires the use of one or more commercially available antibody-small-molecule dyes or antibody-reporter protein conjugates that recognize relatively short peptide tags (<15 amino acids). However, the size of antibodies and their molecular complexity (by virtue of post-translational disulfide formation and glycosylation) typically require either expression in mammalian cells or purification from immunized mammals. The preparation and purification of chemical dye- or reporter protein-antibody conjugates is often complicated and expensive and not commonplace in academic laboratories. In response, researchers have developed comparatively simpler protein scaffolds for macromolecular recognition, which can be expressed with relative ease in E. coli and can be evolved to bind virtually any target. Nanobodies, a minimalist scaffold generated from camelid-derived heavy-chain IgGs, are one such example. A multitude of nanobodies have been evolved to recognize a diverse array of targets, including a short peptide. Here, this peptide tag (termed BC2T) and BC2 nanobody-dye conjugates or reporter protein fusions are evaluated in ELISA, flow cytometry, and Western blot experiments and compared to analogous experiments using commercially available antibody-conjugate/peptide tag pairs. Collectively, the utility and practicality of nanobody-based reagents in bioanalytical chemistry is demonstrated.

Indexed as

AntibodiesColoring AgentsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayIndicators and ReagentsModels, MolecularProteinsSingle-Domain AntibodiesAntibodiesColoring AgentsIndicators and ReagentsProteinsSingle-Domain Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID28316235
PMCPMC5796518
OpenAlexW2602491316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.