Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28315955›Full record

ArticleOecologia2017

Symbiosis with systemic fungal endophytes promotes host escape from vector-borne disease.

L I Perez, P E Gundel, H J Marrero, A González Arzac, M Omacini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Interaction between Grasses andMicroorganisms · 2021
    Review
  5. Antagonism to Plant Pathogens byPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

L I PerezIFEVA-Facultad de Agronomía (UBA)/CONICET, Cátedra de Ecología, Av. San Martín 4453, C1417DSE, Buenos Aires, Argentina. liperez@agro.uba.ar.
P E GundelIFEVA-Facultad de Agronomía (UBA)/CONICET, Cátedra de Ecología, Av. San Martín 4453, C1417DSE, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
H J MarreroInstituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas, CONICET, CC 507, 5500, Mendoza, Argentina.
A González ArzacIFEVA-Facultad de Agronomía (UBA)/CONICET, Cátedra de Ecología, Av. San Martín 4453, C1417DSE, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
M OmaciniIFEVA-Facultad de Agronomía (UBA)/CONICET, Cátedra de Ecología, Av. San Martín 4453, C1417DSE, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Agricultural Plant Physiology and Ecology Research Institute · ARConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARInstituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Aridas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants interact with a myriad of microorganisms that modulate their interactions within the community. A well-described example is the symbiosis between grasses and Epichloë fungal endophytes that protects host plants from herbivores. It is suggested that these symbionts could play a protective role for plants against pathogens through the regulation of their growth and development and/or the induction of host defences. However, other endophyte-mediated ecological mechanisms involved in disease avoidance have been scarcely explored. Here we studied the endophyte impact on plant disease caused by the biotrophic fungus, Claviceps purpurea, under field conditions through (1) changes in the survival of the pathogen´s resistance structure (sclerotia) during overwintering on the soil surface, and (2) effects on insects responsible for the transportation of pathogen spores. This latter mechanism is tested through a visitor exclusion treatment and the measurement of plant volatile cues. We found no significant effects of the endophyte on the survival of sclerotia and thus on disease inocula. However, both pathogen incidence and severity were twofold lower in endophyte-symbiotic plants than in non-symbiotic ones, though when insect visits were prevented this difference disappeared. Endophyte-symbiotic and non-symbiotic plots presented different emission patterns of volatiles suggesting that they can play a role in this protection. We show a novel indirect ecological mechanism by which endophytes can defend host grasses against diseases through negatively interacting with intermediary vectors of the epidemic process.

Indexed as

EndophytesSymbiosisAnimalsEpichloeHerbivoryPoaceaeDisease avoidanceEpichloë occultansMutualismPathogen transmissionVOCs

Identifiers

PMID28315955
OpenAlexW2596093611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.