Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28315809›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2017

Identifying attendance patterns in a smoking cessation treatment and their relationships with quit success.

Jolene Jacquart, Santiago Papini, Michelle L Davis, David Rosenfield, Mark B Powers, Georita M Frierson, Lindsey B Hopkins, Scarlett O Baird, Bess H Marcus, Timothy S Church and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Jolene JacquartDepartment of Psychology and Institute for Mental Health Research, The University of Texas at Austin, SEA 4.208, 108 E. Dean Keeton Stop A8000, Austin, TX, 78712-1043, USA. Electronic address: jolene.jacquart@utexas.edu.
Santiago PapiniDepartment of Psychology and Institute for Mental Health Research, The University of Texas at Austin, SEA 4.208, 108 E. Dean Keeton Stop A8000, Austin, TX, 78712-1043, USA.
Michelle L DavisDepartment of Psychology and Institute for Mental Health Research, The University of Texas at Austin, SEA 4.208, 108 E. Dean Keeton Stop A8000, Austin, TX, 78712-1043, USA.
David RosenfieldDepartment of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, PO Box 750442, Dallas, TX, 75275-0442, USA.
Mark B PowersDepartment of Psychology and Institute for Mental Health Research, The University of Texas at Austin, SEA 4.208, 108 E. Dean Keeton Stop A8000, Austin, TX, 78712-1043, USA; Baylor University Medical Center, 3500 Gaston Ave, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Georita M FriersonDepartment of Psychology, Rowan University,201 Mullica Hill Rd., Glassboro, NJ, 02028, USA.
Lindsey B HopkinsNational Center for PTSD, VA Palo Alto Health Care System,795 Willow Rd., Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Scarlett O BairdDepartment of Psychology and Institute for Mental Health Research, The University of Texas at Austin, SEA 4.208, 108 E. Dean Keeton Stop A8000, Austin, TX, 78712-1043, USA.
Bess H MarcusDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr.-0628, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0628, USA.
Timothy S ChurchPennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University,6400 Perkins Rd., Baton Rouge, LA, 70808, USA.
Michael W OttoDepartment of Psychology and Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, 64 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Michael J ZvolenskyDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston,3695 Cullen Boulevard Room 126,Houston, TX, 77204-5022, USA; Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1330, P.O. Box 301439, Houston, TX 77230-1439, USA.
Jasper A J SmitsDepartment of Psychology and Institute for Mental Health Research, The University of Texas at Austin, SEA 4.208, 108 E. Dean Keeton Stop A8000, Austin, TX, 78712-1043, USA.
The University of Texas at Austin · USBaylor University Medical Center · USBoston University · USNational Center for PTSD · USPennington Biomedical Research Center · USRowan University · USSouthern Methodist University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Exercise Intervention for SmokingR01DA027533 · NIDA · SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY · PI ROSENFIELD, DAVID I, SMITS, JASPER · 2009 to 2012
$2.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA027533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile important for substance use outcomes, knowledge about treatment attendance patterns, and their relation with clinical outcomes is limited. We examined the association between attendance patterns and smoking outcomes in a randomized, controlled smoking cessation intervention trial.

methodsIn addition to standard smoking cessation treatment, participants were randomized to 15 weeks of an exercise intervention (n=72) or an education control condition (n=64). Latent class growth analysis (LCGA) tested whether intervention attendance would be better modeled as qualitatively distinct attendance patterns rather than as a single mean pattern. Multivariate generalized linear mixed modeling (GLMM) was used to evaluate associations between the attendance patterns and abstinence at the end of treatment and at 6-month follow-up.

resultsThe LCGA solution with three patterns characterized by high probability of attendance throughout (Completers, 46.3%), gradual decreasing probability of attendance (Titrators, 23.5%), and high probability of dropout within the first few weeks (Droppers, 30.1%) provided the best fit. The GLMM analysis indicated an interaction of attendance pattern by treatment condition, such that titration was associated with lower probability of quit success for those in the control condition. Probability of quit success was not significantly different between Titrators and Completers in the exercise condition.

conclusionsThese findings underscore the importance of examining how treatment efficacy may vary as a function of attendance patterns. Importantly, treatment discontinuation is not necessarily indicative of poorer abstinence outcome.

Indexed as

AdultExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient DropoutsSmokingSmoking CessationSubstance-Related DisordersTreatment OutcomeAnxiety sensitivityAttendanceDose-responseDropoutExerciseSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID28315809
PMCPMC5423398
OpenAlexW2593105591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.