Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28315673›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2017

Chromosomal Microarray Detection of Constitutional Copy Number Variation Using Saliva DNA.

Jennifer Reiner, Lisa Karger, Ninette Cohen, Lakshmi Mehta, Lisa Edelmann, Stuart A Scott

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Deletion ofCold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer ReinerDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Lisa KargerDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Ninette CohenDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Lakshmi MehtaDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Lisa EdelmannDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Stuart A ScottDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. Electronic address: stuart.scott@mssm.edu.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

The Pharmacogenomic Control of Clopidogrel Response in Acute Coronary SyndromesK23GM104401 · NIGMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SCOTT, STUART ALEXANDER · 2013 to 2016
$778k
NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM104401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal microarray (CMA) testing to detect copy number aberrations among individuals with multiple congenital anomalies and/or developmental delay is typically performed on peripheral blood DNA. However, the use of saliva DNA may be preferred for some patients, which prompted our validation study using six saliva DNA samples with a range of bacterial content (approximately 3% to 21%) and 20 paired blood and saliva specimens on the Agilent Technologies, Illumina, and Affymetrix CMA platforms. Ten of the 20 paired specimens were previously determined to carry clinically significant copy number aberrations by clinical CMA testing on blood DNA (100 kb to 2.56 Mb; five deletions, eight duplications). Notably, the quality of saliva DNA (DNA Genotek) was equivalent to blood DNA regardless of bacterial content, as was CMA quality and single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping quality with all CMA platforms. The number of copy number variants and absence of heterozygosity regions detected by CMA were comparable between paired blood and saliva DNA and, more important, all 13 clinically significant copy number aberrations were detected in saliva DNA by all CMA platforms. These data confirm that the quality of saliva DNA is comparable to blood DNA regardless of bacterial content, including important CMA and single-nucleotide polymorphism quality metrics, and that saliva DNA is a reliable alternative for the detection of clinically significant copy number aberrations by clinical CMA testing.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsDNA Copy Number VariationsGenetic TestingGenotypeHumansKaryotypingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSaliva

Identifiers

PMID28315673
PMCPMC5417105
OpenAlexW2596764541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.