Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28315636›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical case reports2017

Pembrolizumab for metastatic melanoma in a renal allograft recipient with subsequent graft rejection and treatment response failure: a case report.

Vineet Kwatra, Narayan V Karanth, Kelum Priyadarshana, Michail Charakidis

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Multiple sclerosis outcomes after cancer immunotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vineet KwatraMedical Oncology Department, Alan Walker Cancer Centre, Royal Darwin Hospital, 105 Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, NT, 0810, Australia. vkwatz@gmail.com.
Narayan V KaranthMedical Oncology Department, Alan Walker Cancer Centre, Royal Darwin Hospital, 105 Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, NT, 0810, Australia.
Kelum PriyadarshanaNT Renal Services, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Michail CharakidisMedical Oncology Department, Alan Walker Cancer Centre, Royal Darwin Hospital, 105 Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, NT, 0810, Australia.
Royal Darwin Hospital · AUFlinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransplant patients were excluded from the pivotal phase III trials of checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma. The efficacy and toxicity profiles of checkpoint inhibitors in this cohort of patients are not well described. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of a renal transplant patient with stage IV melanoma treated with a programmed cell death protein 1 checkpoint inhibitor that led to both treatment failure and renal graft rejection. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a 58-year-old white man with a long-standing cadaveric renal transplant who was diagnosed with a B-Raf Proto-Oncogene, Serine/Threonine Kinase wild-type metastatic melanoma. He was treated with first-line pembrolizumab but experienced subsequent graft failure and rapid disease progression.

conclusionsThis case highlights the risks associated with the administration of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with a renal transplant and on immunosuppressive therapy. More specifically, it adds to the literature indicating that, compared with the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitor ipilimumab, anti-programmed cell death protein 1 agents are more likely to lead to renal graft failure. Additionally, these novel immunotherapeutics may be ineffective in transplant patients; therefore, clinicians should be very aware of those risks and carefully consider selection of agents and full disclosure of the risks to their patients.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsFatal OutcomeGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsIpilimumabKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorProto-Oncogene MasProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsBRAF protein, humanImmunosuppressive AgentsIpilimumabMAS1 protein, humanpembrolizumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorProto-Oncogene MasProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafCase reportCheckpoint inhibitorsMelanomaToxicityTransplant

Identifiers

PMID28315636
PMCPMC5357565
OpenAlexW2593637053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.