ArticleNutrition journal2017
Behaviors of consumers, physicians and pharmacists in response to adverse events associated with dietary supplement use.
Article in Nutrition journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge Gaps and Educational Interventions in Dietary Supplement Regulations Among Resident Physicians.Cureus · 2025Article
- Patients Are Using Dietary Supplement for the Treatment of Their Diseases without Consultation with Their Physicians and Pharmacists.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Differences in the Perception of Dietary Supplements between Dietary Supplement/Medicine Users and Non-Users.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with dietary supplement use among Bangladeshi public university students: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2022Article
- Analysis of Dietary Supplement Use and Influencing Factors in the Mongolian Population.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Community Pharmacists' Views and Experiences with ADR Reporting for Complementary Medicines: A Qualitative Study in New Zealand.Drug safety · 2020Article
- An educational intervention improved knowledge of dietary supplements in college students.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Natural Product Dietary Supplement Use by Individuals With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Scoping Review.Arthritis care & research · 2019Article
- Use of Dietary Supplements among Spanish Pediatricians in Daily Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Journal of nutrition and metabolism · 2019Article
- The Prevalence of Dietary Supplement Use Among Elementary, Junior High, and High School Students: A Nationwide Survey in Japan.Nutrients · 2018Article
- Habits and beliefs related to food supplements: Results of a survey among Italian students of different education fields and levels.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of dietary supplements has increased in Japan, and, as a consequence, the adverse events associated with dietary supplement use have become more prominent. Severe adverse events must be reported to the Japanese government via public health centers. However, the number of cases reported to the Japanese government is limited. To clarify this discrepancy, we conducted an internet questionnaire, and surveyed how consumers, physicians and pharmacists acted when they or their patients developed adverse events due to dietary supplement use.
methodsThis study was completed by 2732 consumers, 515 physicians, and 515 pharmacist via internet surveillance on November 2015.
resultsAlthough 8.8% of consumers developed adverse events including diarrhea, constipation, stomachache, headache, and nausea and vomiting, most of them did not report their adverse events to public health centers. However, some consumers went to hospitals because of adverse events. We also surveyed how physicians and pharmacists acted when their patients developed adverse events due to dietary supplement use. Most physicians and pharmacists did not report these cases to public health centers because they were unable to definitively prove the cause-and-effect relationship of these adverse events. Furthermore, some physicians and pharmacists did not know how or where to report these adverse events.
conclusionsWe clarified the reasons for the limited number of reports of adverse events to the Japanese government in this survey. It is important to encourage not only consumers, but also physicians and pharmacists to report adverse events to public health centers. In addition, an analyzing tool of cause-and-effect relationships might be helpful for physicians and pharmacists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.