Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28315622›Full record

ArticleJAMA cardiology2017

Subclinical Atherosclerosis, Statin Eligibility, and Outcomes in African American Individuals: The Jackson Heart Study.

Ravi V Shah, Aferdita Spahillari, Stanford Mwasongwe, J Jeffrey Carr, James G Terry, Robert J Mentz, Daniel Addison, Udo Hoffmann, Jared Reis, Jane E Freedman and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Subclinical cardiovascular disease and utility of coronary artery calcium score.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Preventive Cardiology and Risk Assessment: Beyond LDL.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Coronary Calcium Score and Cardiovascular Risk.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Ravi V ShahDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Aferdita SpahillariDivision of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts3Department of Cardiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stanford MwasongweField Center, Jackson Heart Study, Jackson State University, Jackson, Mississippi.
J Jeffrey CarrDepartment of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
James G TerryDepartment of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Robert J MentzDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Daniel AddisonCardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiac Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Udo HoffmannCardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiac Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Jared ReisDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jane E FreedmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.
Joao A C LimaDepartment of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Adolfo CorreaDepartment of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson.
Venkatesh L MurthyCardiovascular Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USClinical Research Institute · USHarvard University · USJackson State University · USJohns Hopkins University · USMichigan Medicine · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USTufts Medical Center · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

Myocardial tissue architecture in heart failure: implications on physiology and fitnessK23HL127099 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SHAH, RAVI · 2016 to 2019
$668k
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300046CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300047CNHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL127099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Modern prevention guidelines substantially increase the number of individuals who are eligible for treatment with statins. Efforts to refine statin eligibility via coronary calcification have been studied in white populations but not, to our knowledge, in large African American populations. Objective: To compare the relative accuracy of US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) recommendations in identifying African American individuals with subclinical and clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective, community-based study, 2812 African American individuals aged 40 to 75 years without prevalent ASCVD underwent assessment of ASCVD risk. Of these, 1743 participants completed computed tomography. Main Outcomes and Measures: Nonzero coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, abdominal aortic calcium score, and incident ASCVD (ie, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or fatal coronary heart disease). Results: Of the 2812 included participants, the mean (SD) age at baseline was 55.4 (9.4) years, and 1837 (65.3%) were female. The USPSTF guidelines captured 404 of 732 African American individuals (55.2%) with a CAC score greater than 0; the ACC/AHA guidelines identified 507 individuals (69.3%) (risk difference, 14.1%; 95% CI, 11.2-17.0; P < .001). Statin recommendation under both guidelines was associated with a CAC score greater than 0 (odds ratio, 5.1; 95% CI, 4.1-6.3; P < .001). While individuals indicated for statins under both guidelines experienced 9.6 cardiovascular events per 1000 patient-years, those indicated under only ACC/AHA guidelines were at low to intermediate risk (4.1 events per 1000 patient-years). Among individuals who were statin eligible by ACC/AHA guidelines, the 10-year ASCVD incidence per 1000 person-years was 8.1 (95% CI, 5.9-11.1) in the presence of CAC and 3.1 (95% CI, 1.6-5.9) without CAC (P = .02). While statin-eligible individuals by USPSTF guidelines did not have a significantly higher 10-year ASCVD event rate in the presence of CAC, African American individuals not eligible for statins by USPSTF guidelines had a higher ASCVD event rate in the presence of CAC (2.8 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.5-5.4) relative to without CAC (0.8 per 1000 person-years; 95%, CI 0.3-1.7) (P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: The USPSTF guidelines focus treatment recommendations on 38% of high-risk African American individuals at the expense of not recommending treatment in nearly 25% of African American individuals eligible for statins by ACC/AHA guidelines with vascular calcification and at low to intermediate ASCVD risk.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAorta, AbdominalAtherosclerosisBlack or African AmericanCoronary Artery DiseaseEligibility DeterminationFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMississippiPractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID28315622
PMCPMC5815027
OpenAlexW2596239528

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.