Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28315546›Full record

SynthesisClinical journal of oncology nursing2017

Unintended Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Contraception Use and Counseling in Women With Cancer.

Laura Britton

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical journal of oncology nursing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Management of Primary Ovarian Insufficiency Symptoms in Survivors of Childhood and Adolescent Cancer.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Kidney disease and reproductive health.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Contraceptive utilization and counseling among breast cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura BrittonUniversity of North Carolina in Chapel Hill.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

INTERVENTIONS FOR PREVENTING &MANAGING CHRONIC ILLNESST32NR007091 · NINR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Cheryl L Giscombe, Cathi Barbra Propper · 1996 to 2026
$11.8M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with past or current cancer diagnoses can benefit from planning pregnancies to optimize maternal health and birth outcomes.
.

objectivesThe purpose of this systematic review is to identify unmet needs for family planning services among women with cancer by describing the prevalence of contraception counseling, contraception use, unintended pregnancy, and abortion.
.

methodsUsing the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, 16 studies were included.
.

findingsWomen with cancer experience unintended pregnancy and abortion throughout their care. Not all women reported receiving contraception counseling, and many reported inconsistencies between contraception counseling desired and received. A prominent theme was uncertainty about fertility status. Use of highly effective contraceptive methods was low to moderate in eight patient populations.

Indexed as

ContraceptionCounselingNeoplasmsPregnancy, UnplannedAdultFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansPregnancyabortionbirth controlcontraceptionfamily planningunintended pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID28315546
PMCPMC5878924
OpenAlexW2601887117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.