ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2017
Validation of Bevacizumab Therapy Effect on Colon Cancer Subtypes by Using Whole Body Imaging in Mice.
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- How Different Albumin-Binders Drive Probe Distribution of Fluorescent RGD Mimetics.Frontiers in chemistry · 2021Article
- The efficacy of lapatinib and nilotinib in combination with radiation therapy in a model of NF2 associated peripheral schwannoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2017Article
- Safety of Intravitreal Injection of Stivant, a Biosimilar to Bevacizumab, in Rabbit Eyes.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePreclinical imaging offers a useful tool for monitoring cancer biological behavior and therapy in vivo without the necessity of animal surgery. The following paper describes our examination of tumor progress and anti-angiogenic therapy with Bevacizumab on colon cancer subtypes (SW480 and SW620) by using different non-invasive real-time in vivo imaging techniques. PROCEDURES: Color Doppler ultrasound imaging (CDUI) was used to observe the formation of new blood vessels; a homemade fluorescence reflectance imaging (FRI) apparatus was mainly used to test the difference in VEGFR2 expression between the tumor subtypes. Briefly, 15 Balb/c nude mice bearing subcutaneous SW480 and SW620 xenografts were randomly divided into Control and Drug groups. Bevacizumab treatment lasted for 3 weeks. All images were captured pre- and post-treatment. At the end of experiment, all mice were euthanized, and tumor tissue was collected and analyzed by immunohistochemical staining.
resultsExpression of VEGFR2 was found to be slightly (10 %) but significantly higher for the SW620 cells than for SW480 cells. In addition, SW620 has shown to be more vascularized than SW480 subtype. After 3-week Bevacizumab therapy, no blood vessels were found within 83 % of SW620, while it was 67 % in SW480; the increase of SW620 tumor volume post-treatment was only 3.17-fold compared with the tumor volume pre-treatment, and 4.51-fold higher in SW480.
conclusionOur data suggest that SW480 and SW620 cell lines respond differently to Bevacizumab therapy in vivo. Because of higher vascularization, and subsequently higher reduction by drug of new blood vessels and tumor growth rate, xenografts derived from the metastatic SW620 cell line have a better chance of being successfully treated with Bevacizumab compared with those derived from the primary tumor SW480 cell line.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.