Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28315161›Full record

ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2017

The effect of live feeds bathed with the red seaweed Asparagopsis armata on the survival, growth and physiology status of Sparus aurata larvae.

S Castanho, G Califano, F Soares, R Costa, L Mata, P Pousão-Ferreira, L Ribeiro

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Isolation of Potential ProbioticAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

S CastanhoPortuguese Institute for the Ocean and Atmosphere (IPMA), Aquaculture Research Station (EPPO), Av. 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700-305, Olhão, Portugal.
G CalifanoMicrobial Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Centre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), Algarve University, Gambelas Campus, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal.
F SoaresPortuguese Institute for the Ocean and Atmosphere (IPMA), Aquaculture Research Station (EPPO), Av. 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700-305, Olhão, Portugal.
R CostaMicrobial Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Centre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), Algarve University, Gambelas Campus, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal.
L MataMACRO-the Centre for Macroalgal Resources and Biotechnology and College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
P Pousão-FerreiraPortuguese Institute for the Ocean and Atmosphere (IPMA), Aquaculture Research Station (EPPO), Av. 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700-305, Olhão, Portugal.
L RibeiroPortuguese Institute for the Ocean and Atmosphere (IPMA), Aquaculture Research Station (EPPO), Av. 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700-305, Olhão, Portugal. lribeiro@ipma.pt.
Portuguese Sea and Atmosphere Institute · PTFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DEJames Cook University · AUUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Larval rearing is affected by a wide range of microorganisms that thrive in larviculture systems. Some seaweed species have metabolites capable of reducing the bacterial load. However, no studies have yet tested whether including seaweed metabolites on larval rearing systems has any effects on the larvae development. This work assessed the development of Sparus aurata larvae fed preys treated with an Asparagopsis armata product. Live prey, Brachionus spp. and Artemia sp., were immersed in a solution containing 0.5% of a commercial extract of A. armata (Ysaline 100, YSA) for 30 min, before being fed to seabream larvae (n = 4 each). In the control, the live feed was immersed in clear water. Larval parameters such as growth, survival, digestive capacity (structural-histology and functional-enzymatic activity), stress level (cortisol content), non-specific immune response (lysozyme activity), anti-bacterial activity (disc-diffusion assay) and microbiota quantification (fish larvae gut and rearing water) were monitored. Fish larvae digestive capacity, stress level and non-specific immune response were not affected by the use of YSA. The number of Vibrionaceae was significantly reduced both in water and larval gut when using YSA. Growth was enhanced for YSA treatment, but higher mortality was also observed, especially until 10 days after hatching (DAH). The mortality peak observed at 8 DAH for both treatments, but higher for YSA, indicates larval higher susceptibility at this development stage, suggesting that lower concentrations of YSA should be used until 10 DAH. The application of YSA after 10 DAH onwards promotes a safer rearing environment.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArtemiaBacteriaDietDigestionFeeding BehaviorLarvaPlant ExtractsRhodophytaRotiferaSea BreamAnti-Bacterial AgentsPlant ExtractsAquacultureCortisolDigestive capacityGrowthLysozymeMacroalgaeMicrobiotaSeabream larvae

Identifiers

PMID28315161
OpenAlexW2596718882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.