Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28315123›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2017

Coronary Stents in Diabetic Patients: State of the Knowledge.

Pablo Codner, Hitinder Singh Gurm, Apurva Motivala

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diabetes and restenosis.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pablo CodnerInterventional Cardiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital & Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10032, USA. psc2148@columbia.cumc.edu.
Hitinder Singh GurmDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Apurva MotivalaInterventional Cardiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital & Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review article aims to summarize the findings of the most relevant research that compared the use of paclitaxel vs. "limus" based drug eluting stent (DES) in diabetic patients and to define the current state of knowledge with new stent technologies in this patient population. RECENT

findingsSince drug eluting stents (DES) were introduced, it has been of great interest to establish whether paclitaxel or sirolimus eluting stents have the same safety and efficacy features for patients with coronary artery disease. The answer to this question is particularly relevant for diabetic patients. Several randomized trials, registry-based studies, and meta-analyses have assessed the performance of these different DES in diabetic patients. The most recently published data favors limus over paclitaxel DES in diabetic patients, but most of these studies compared first vs. second generation DES with the inherent caveats of comparing different platforms, alloys, and drug delivery vehicles. In this literature review, we found that there is robust evidence favoring the use of DES over bare metal stents in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. We also found that the current state of knowledge is that the everolimus eluting stents have better safety and efficacy than paclitaxel eluting stents in diabetic patients and hence should be the preferred choice. New revascularization strategies including bio-absorbable scaffolds, polymer free stents, and bio-degradable polymers are being studied in diabetic patients with encouraging results.

Indexed as

Drug-Eluting StentsCoronary DiseaseDiabetic AngiopathiesEverolimusHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsPaclitaxelSirolimusTreatment OutcomeEverolimusImmunosuppressive AgentsPaclitaxelSirolimusDiabetes mellitusDrug eluting stentIn stent restenosisPaclitaxel eluting stentSirolimus eluting stentTarget vessel revascularization

Identifiers

PMID28315123
OpenAlexW2595883328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.