Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28315049›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2017

Antihypertensive Effects of Probiotics.

Iñaki Robles-Vera, Marta Toral, Miguel Romero, Rosario Jiménez, Manuel Sánchez, Francisco Pérez-Vizcaíno, Juan Duarte

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Immunology of Hypertension: Pathophysiological and Therapeutic Aspects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Postbiotics: an insightful review of the latest category in functional biotics.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Nutraceuticals in Pregnancy: A Special Focus on Probiotics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Iñaki Robles-VeraDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, University of Granada, CIBER-Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CiberCV), 18071, Granada, Spain.
Marta ToralDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, University of Granada, CIBER-Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CiberCV), 18071, Granada, Spain.
Miguel RomeroDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, University of Granada, CIBER-Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CiberCV), 18071, Granada, Spain.
Rosario JiménezDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, University of Granada, CIBER-Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CiberCV), 18071, Granada, Spain.
Manuel SánchezDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, University of Granada, CIBER-Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CiberCV), 18071, Granada, Spain.
Francisco Pérez-VizcaínoDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid; CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias (Ciberes) and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IISGM), Madrid, Spain.
Juan DuarteDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, University of Granada, CIBER-Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CiberCV), 18071, Granada, Spain. jmduarte@ugr.es.
Universidad de Granada · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ESInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe present review focuses in the hypertension-associated changes in the microbiota and the current insights regarding the impact of probiotics on blood pressure in animal models and in human hypertensive patients. RECENT

findingsGut dysbiosis in hypertension is characterized by (i) the gut microbioma that is less diverse and less rich with an increased Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio and (ii) a decrease in acetate- and butyrate-producing bacteria and an increase in lactate-producing bacterial populations. The meta-analysis of the human studies supports that supplementation with probiotics reduces blood pressure. The mechanism of this antihypertensive effect of probiotics and its protective effect on endothelial function has not been fully elucidated. Further investigations are needed to clarify if the effects of probiotic bacteria result from the changes in the gut microbiota and its metabolic by-products; the restoration of the gut barrier function; and the effects on endotoxemia, inflammation, and renal sympathetic nerve activity.

Indexed as

ProbioticsAnimalsAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHumansHypertensionInflammationKidneyAntihypertensive AgentsEndothelial dysfunctionGut microbiotaHypertensionProbiotic bacteria

Identifiers

PMID28315049
OpenAlexW2594994892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.