Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28315036›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2017

Diagnosing Chronic Pancreatitis.

Ahmad Anaizi, Phil A Hart, Darwin L Conwell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Biomarkers of Chronic Pancreatitis: A systematic literature review.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Reduction of inflammation in chronic pancreatitis using a soy bread intervention: A feasibility study.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Treatment Strategies for Chronic Pancreatitis (CP).Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Basic Pancreatic Lesions: Radiologic-pathologic Correlation.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Imaging of inflammatory disease of the pancreas.The British journal of radiology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Imaging of Fibrosis in Chronic Pancreatitis.Frontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Quantitative pancreatic MRI: a pathology-based review.The British journal of radiology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmad AnaiziSection of Pancreatic Disorders, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 West Tenth Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Phil A HartSection of Pancreatic Disorders, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 West Tenth Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Darwin L ConwellSection of Pancreatic Disorders, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 West Tenth Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. Darwin.conwell@osumc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0449-3730

Funding

The Ohio State University Pancreatic Disorders Network (OSU-PDN)U01DK108327 · NIDDK · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CONWELL, DARWIN LEWIS, HART, PHILIP A. · 2015 to 2024
$5.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK108327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosing CP can range from routine in those with severe disease and obvious calcifications on CT imaging to elusive in those patients with early changes in CP. The workup of suspected CP should follow a progressively noninvasive to more invasive STEP-wise approach in a patient with a suspicious clinical presentation and risk factors that raise their pretest probability of disease. After a thorough history and physical examination, basic laboratories should be obtained such as lipase, amylase, metabolic panel, and indirect PFTs (fecal elastase-1, serum trypsin). Computed tomography remains the best initial imaging modality to obtain as it has good sensitivity for severe CP and may obviate the need for other diagnostic tests. When equivocal, an MRCP should be obtained for a more detailed evaluation of the both the pancreatic parenchyma and ducts. If the diagnosis remains in doubt, EUS should be performed with or without pancreas function testing. ERCP remains a last-line diagnostic test and seldom should be used outside of therapeutic purposes. Future advances should target optimizing current diagnostic tools to more accurately diagnose early CP, as it is in this population where the benefits of delaying progression of CP may have the most profound effect. Likely the best way at establishing a diagnosis in these patients is via pancreatic function testing in the setting of indeterminate EUS results. Biomarker studies of pancreas fluid may supplement diagnosis.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonancePancreatitis, ChronicRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedChronic pancreatitisEUSMinimal change pancreatitisMRCPPancreatic function tests

Identifiers

PMID28315036
PMCPMC5478450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.