Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28315018›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2017

Influence of pelvic volume on surgical outcome after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

G Zur Hausen, J Gröne, D Kaufmann, S M Niehues, K Aschenbrenner, A Stroux, B Hamm, M E Kreis, Johannes C Lauscher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Diagnosis of Anastomotic Leak.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G Zur HausenDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
J GröneDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
D KaufmannDepartment of Radiology, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany.
S M NiehuesDepartment of Radiology, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany.
K AschenbrennerDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
A StrouxInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10098, Berlin, Germany.
B HammDepartment of Radiology, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany.
M E KreisDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Johannes C LauscherDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany. johannes.lauscher@charite.de.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer is a potentially challenging operation due to limited space in the pelvis. CT pelvimetry allows to quantify pelvic space, so that its relationship with outcome after LAR may be assessed. Studies investigating this, however, yielded conflicting results. We hypothesized that a small pelvis is associated with a higher rate of incomplete mesorectal excision, anastomotic leakages, and increased rate of urinary dysfunction in patients operated for rectal cancer.

methodsIn a single-center retrospective analysis, we studied 74 patients that underwent LAR for rectal cancer with primary anastomosis. Thin-layered multi-slice CT datasets were used for slice by slice depiction of the inner pelvic surface, and the inner pelvic volume was automatically compounded. The primary outcome was quality of total mesorectal excision (TME; Mercury grading); secondary outcomes were anastomotic leakage and urinary dysfunction with regard to pelvic dimensions. Univariate analyses and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed for the primary and the secondary outcomes.

resultsShorter obstetric conjugate diameters were associated with a higher probability of a worse TME quality (110.8 ± 10.2 vs. 105.0 ± 8.6 mm; OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73-0.99; p = 0.038). Short interspinous distance showed a trend towards an increased risk for deteriorated TME quality (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.76-1.0; p = 0.06). Anastomotic leakage was associated with anemia (OR 2.77; 95% CI 1.0-7.7; p = 0.047). Association between pelvic diameters or pelvic volume and anastomotic leakage or urinary dysfunction was not observed. Perioperative blood transfusions were administered more often in patients with postoperative urinary dysfunction (OR 17.67; 95% CI 2.44-127.7; p = 0.004).

conclusionShorter obstetric conjugate diameter might be a risk factor for incompleteness of total mesorectal excision. Anastomotic leakage seems to be influenced more by clinical factors such as anemia rather than pelvic dimensions. Further studies have to prove the influence of pelvic diameter on local recurrence of rectal cancer after LAR.

Indexed as

AgedAnastomotic LeakDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMultivariate AnalysisOrgan SizePelvisRectal NeoplasmsRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeAnastomotic leakageCompleteness of mesorectal excisionCT pelvimetryRectal cancerRectal resectionUrinary dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID28315018
OpenAlexW2595091483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.