Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28314974›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2017

Health-related quality of life prospectively evaluated by the 8-item short form after endovascular repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Takayoshi Kato, Mototsugu Tamaki, Tomohiro Tsunekawa, Yusuke Motoji, Akihiro Hirakawa, Yasuhide Okawa, Shinji Tomita

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quality of Life for Males With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takayoshi KatoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Gifu Heart Center, 4-14-4 Yabuta-minami, Gifu, Gifu, 500-8384, Japan. tkato@heart-center.or.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5121-0006
Mototsugu TamakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Gifu Heart Center, 4-14-4 Yabuta-minami, Gifu, Gifu, 500-8384, Japan.
Tomohiro TsunekawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Gifu Heart Center, 4-14-4 Yabuta-minami, Gifu, Gifu, 500-8384, Japan.
Yusuke MotojiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Gifu Heart Center, 4-14-4 Yabuta-minami, Gifu, Gifu, 500-8384, Japan.
Akihiro HirakawaBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Section, Center for Advanced Medicine and Clinical Research, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Yasuhide OkawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Gifu Heart Center, 4-14-4 Yabuta-minami, Gifu, Gifu, 500-8384, Japan.
Shinji TomitaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Gifu Heart Center, 4-14-4 Yabuta-minami, Gifu, Gifu, 500-8384, Japan.
Gifu Heart Center · JPNagoya University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open repair for infra-renal abdominal aortic and iliac artery aneurysms (AAAs) is a robust treatment. On the other hand, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been widespread because of its less invasiveness. However, patients after EVAR frequently require postoperative radiographic examinations and may feel anxiety for their endoleaks. We prospectively evaluated Health-related Quality of Life of the patients with these two fashions using the 8-item Short Form (SF-8). From 2011 to 2013, 89 consecutive elective cases of AAAs were treated. They were prospectively divided into EVAR and open repair groups but not randomly. The exclusion criteria were as follows: perioperative status for other surgeries, infectious aneurysm, severely deteriorated conditions, and patients who cannot answer for these questionnaire or show their consent. The SF-8 questionnaire was completed through interviews preoperatively, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. The SF-8 questionnaire was completed for 55 cases [EVAR group (ER): 25, open repair group (OR): 30]. There was no significant difference between these groups regarding patients' characteristics except congestive heart disease. The preoperative scores of the SF-8 were similar in both groups except physical function and social function, which were lower in ER (p < 0.05). There was no operative death in both groups. Operative duration and hospital stay in EVAR were significantly shorter than those in OR (p < 0.05). Follow-up rate at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months was 100, 100, 68.0, and 64.0% in ER, and 100, 90.0, 80.0, and 66.6% in OR, respectively. During follow-up, both groups had no AAAs associated death. Regarding changes of the SF-8 scales, there were some trends at physical component summary score (PCS) and mental component summary score (MCS) in ER. The PCS decreased at 1 month, gradually increased at 3 months, and levelled off until 12 months. The MCS increased at 1 and 3 months, but gradually went down and almost stayed at the same level as preoperative one at 12 months. In OR, PCS and MCS decreased at 1 month and after that increased gradually at 3 and 6 months, and stayed the same at 12 months. The MCS recovered to preoperative score earlier than the PCS. In this study, EVAR did not show any significant mental disturbance based on the SF-8 for 1-year comparing to open repair.

Indexed as

Health StatusQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAgedAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationElective Surgical ProceduresEndovascular ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLength of StayMaleProspective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAbdominal aortic aneurysmEndovascular aneurysm repairHealth-related quality of lifeThe 8-item short form

Identifiers

PMID28314974
OpenAlexW2596466432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.