Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28314961›Full record

ReviewEcotoxicology (London, England)2017

Ecotoxicity of boric acid in standard laboratory tests with plants and soil organisms.

Juliska Princz, Leonie Becker, Adam Scheffczyk, Gladys Stephenson, Rick Scroggins, Thomas Moser, Jörg Römbke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Juliska PrinczEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Biological Assessment and Standardization Section, 335 River Road, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0H3, Canada. Juliska.Princz@canada.ca.
Leonie BeckerECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH, Böttgerstraße 2-14, D-65439, Flörsheim, Germany.
Adam ScheffczykECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH, Böttgerstraße 2-14, D-65439, Flörsheim, Germany.
Gladys StephensonAquaterra Environmental Consulting Inc., Orton, ON, L0N 1N0, Canada.
Rick ScrogginsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Biological Assessment and Standardization Section, 335 River Road, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0H3, Canada.
Thomas MoserECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH, Böttgerstraße 2-14, D-65439, Flörsheim, Germany.
Jörg RömbkeECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH, Böttgerstraße 2-14, D-65439, Flörsheim, Germany.
ECT Oekotoxikologie (Germany) · DEEnvironment and Climate Change Canada · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To verify the continuous sensitivity of ecotoxicological tests (mainly the test organisms), reference substances with known toxicity are regularly tested. Ideally, this substance(s) would lack specificity in its mode action, be bioavailable and readily attainable with cost-effective means of chemical characterization. Boric acid has satisfied these criteria, but has most recently been characterized as a substance of very high concern, due to reproductive effects in humans, thus limiting its recommendation as an ideal reference toxicant. However, there is probably no other chemical for which ecotoxicity in soil has been so intensively studied; an extensive literature review yielded lethal (including avoidance) and sublethal data for 38 taxa. The ecotoxicity data were evaluated using species sensitivity distributions, collectively across all taxa, and separately according to species type, endpoints, soil type and duration. The lack of specificity in the mode of action yielded broad toxicity among soil taxa and soil types, and provided a collective approach to assessing species sensitivity, while taking into consideration differences in test methodologies and exposure durations. Toxicity was species-specific with Folsomia candida and enchytraied species demonstrating the most sensitivity; among plants, the following trend occurred: dicotyledonous (more sensitive) ≫ monocotyledonous ≫ gymnosperm species. Sensitivity was also time and endpoint specific, with endpoints such as lethality and avoidance being less sensitive than reproduction effects. Furthermore, given the breadth of data and toxicity demonstrated by boric acid, lessons learned from its evaluation are discussed to recommend the properties required by an ideal reference substance for the soil compartment.

Indexed as

Toxicity TestsAnimalsArthropodsBoric AcidsEcotoxicologyPlantsSoilSoil Pollutantsboric acidBoric AcidsSoilSoil PollutantsBoric acidInvertebratesReference substanceSoilSSDToxicity

Identifiers

PMID28314961
OpenAlexW2597110260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.