Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28314959›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2017

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) of the head and neck: retrospective analysis of 81 patients.

Basel Al Kadah, Giorgos Papaspyrou, Maximilian Linxweiler, Bernhard Schick, Christian Rübe, Benjamin Simeon Büchler, Marcus Niewald

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Basel Al KadahDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66421, Homburg/saar, Germany. basel.al-kadah@uks.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8012-0448
Giorgos PapaspyrouDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66421, Homburg/saar, Germany.
Maximilian LinxweilerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66421, Homburg/saar, Germany.
Bernhard SchickDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66421, Homburg/saar, Germany.
Christian RübeDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/saar, Germany.
Benjamin Simeon BüchlerDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/saar, Germany.
Marcus NiewaldDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/saar, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of patients with cervical lymph node metastases without detectable primary tumor remains an important challenge, until today, no standard therapy is available. The present study investigated the multimodal treatment of patients with head and neck CUP syndrome (HNCUP) and their follow-up retrospectively. 81 patients with cervical lymph node metastases without a primary tumor were treated at the Departments of Otorhinolaryngology as well as Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology at the University of Saarland in Homburg, Germany in the period between 1991 and 2013. All patients received routine work-up consisting of CUP panendoscopy and imaging. Neck dissection was then performed in 77% of the patients. The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma (80%). Ten percent of the patients had distant metastases. All patients underwent primary or adjuvant radiation therapy, or simultaneous radiochemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the 5-year survival rate was 30%. There was a local recurrence that was known in 20/63 patients (31%) and distant metastases were documented in 19/61 M0 patients (31%). Higher grade late toxicity (grade 3-4) was observed in 12% of patients. Neck dissection and radiation therapy remains an integral part of HNCUP therapy, while the use of chemotherapy could be considered in selected cases. Prospective multicenter randomized trials would be necessary to identify the best target volume and to clarify the role of chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Neck DissectionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasms, Unknown PrimaryAntineoplastic AgentsCervical lymph nodesChemotherapyCUPNeck dissectionRadiation therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.