Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28314930›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2017

Non-reproducible sequence artifacts in FFPE tissue: an experience report.

Richard Ofner, Cathrin Ritter, Selma Ugurel, Lorenzo Cerroni, Mathias Stiller, Thomas Bogenrieder, Flavio Solca, David Schrama, Jürgen C Becker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Standards for Quantitative Measurement of DNA Damage in Mammalian Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard OfnerDepartment of General Dermatology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Cathrin RitterDepartment of General Dermatology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Selma UgurelDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.
Lorenzo CerroniDepartment of General Dermatology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Mathias StillerTranslational Skin Cancer Research-TSCR, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Thomas BogenriederBoehringer Ingelheim RCV, Vienna, Austria.
Flavio SolcaBoehringer Ingelheim RCV, Vienna, Austria.
David SchramaDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Jürgen C BeckerDepartment of General Dermatology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria. j.becker@dkfz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9183-653X
German Cancer Research Center · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (Austria) · ATMedical University of Graz · ATEssen University Hospital · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in sequencing technologies supported the development of molecularly targeted therapy in cancer patients. Thus, genomic analyses are becoming a routine part in clinical practice and accurate detection of actionable mutations is essential to assist diagnosis and therapy choice. However, this is often challenging due to major problems associated with DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue which is usually the primary source for genetic testing.

objectivesHere we want to share our experience regarding major problems associated with FFPE DNA used for PCR-based sequencing as illustrated by the mutational analysis of ERBB4 in melanoma. We want to focus on two major problems including extensive DNA fragmentation and hydrolytic deamination as source of non-reproducible sequence artifacts. Further, we provide potential explanations and possible strategies to minimize these difficulties and improve the detection of targetable mutations.

methodsGenomic DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples was isolated followed by PCR amplification, Sanger sequencing and statistical analysis.

resultsAnalysis of Sanger sequencing data revealed a total of 46 ERBB4 mutations in 27 of 96 samples including the identification of 11 mutations at three previously unknown mutational hotspots. Unfortunately, we were not able to confirm any assumed hotspot mutation within repeated sequencing of relevant amplicons suggesting the detection of sequence artifacts most likely caused by DNA lesions associated with FFPE tissues.

conclusionSince DNA from FFPE tissue is usually the primary source for mutational analyses, appropriate measures must be implemented in the workflow to assess DNA damage in formalin-fixed tissue to ensure accurate detection of actionable mutations and minimize the occurrence of sequence artifacts.

Indexed as

ArtifactsParaffin EmbeddingTissue FixationBase SequenceDNADNA Mutational AnalysisFormaldehydeHumansMelanomaPolymerase Chain ReactionReceptor, ErbB-4DNAERBB4 protein, humanFormaldehydeReceptor, ErbB-4ERBB4FFPEMelanomaSanger sequencingSequencing artifacts

Identifiers

PMID28314930
PMCPMC11819302
OpenAlexW2597015131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.