Trial reportHerz2018
Effect of remote ischemic postconditioning during thrombolysis in STEMI.
Trial report in Herz, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote ischemic post‑conditioning alleviates ischemia/reperfusion‑induced intestinal injury via the ERK signaling pathway‑mediated RAGE/HMGB axis.Molecular medicine reports · 2021Article
- Myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury and cardioprotection in perspective.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2020Review
- Influence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Comorbidities, Medication Use and Procedural Variables on Remote Ischemic Conditioning Efficacy in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRemote ischemic postconditioning (RIPC) is suggested to protect the myocardium against ischemia in various settings. However, the effect of RIPC in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who undergo thrombolysis has yet to be examined. PATIENTS AND
methodsIn this single-center, randomized controlled trial, we examined the effect of RIPC on the resolution of ST-segment elevation (STR) in response to thrombolysis. Patients in the RIPC group had three cycles of 5‑min cuff inflation followed by 5‑min deflation to the upper arm.
resultsThe study comprised 78 patients (15 women), of whom 41 were randomized to the RIPC group and 37 to the control group. STR occurred in 61% of the patients in the RIPC group, while it was detected only in 35% of controls (p = 0.026). Although STR was more common in the RIPC group, there was no difference in the extent of ΣCK-48 h between the two groups. Furthermore, the length of hospital stay and the frequency of adverse events were similar between the RIPC and control groups.
conclusionRIPC during thrombolytic therapy in STEMI was associated with a higher frequency of STR. However, it did not affect enzymatic infarct size or the frequency of adverse events. (Clinical trial registration number: IRCT2014011916229N2.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
28314876What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.