Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28314744›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Randomised controlled trial comparing ofatumumab to rituximab in children with steroid-dependent and calcineurin inhibitor-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: study protocol.

Pietro Ravani, Alice Bonanni, Gian Marco Ghiggeri

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02394119 (Ofatumumab Versus Rituximab in Children With Steroid and Calcineurin Inhibitor-dependent Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02394119 phase2completednot on this map

Ofatumumab Versus Rituximab in Children With Steroid and Calcineurin Inhibitor-dependent Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome: an Open-label, Randomized, Controlled, Superiority Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Giannina GasliniRan2015 to 2019Enrolled140ConditionsNephrotic SyndromeArmsOfatumumab, Rituximab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Update on the treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Response to Majeranowski.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pietro RavaniDivision of Nephrology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Alice BonanniDivision of Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, Giannina Gaslini Children's Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Gian Marco GhiggeriDivision of Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, Giannina Gaslini Children's Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Istituto Giannina Gaslini · ITUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOral steroids induce remission in about 90% of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), which is characterised by severe proteinuria and hypoalbuminaemia. Some children become steroid-dependent (SD) and require addition of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to maintain remission. Since these oral agents are toxic, alternative interventions are needed for long-term treatment. The anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has shown promising steroid-sparing properties in clinical trials, but benefits are less convincing in complicated forms of SD-INS. Ofatumumab, a new anti-CD20 antibody with stronger affinity to CD20, may be superior to rituximab in maintaining oral steroid-free and CNI-free disease remission in children with SD-INS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This open-label, two-parallel-arm, controlled, phase II randomised clinical trial will enrol children with SD-INS maintained in remission with oral steroids and CNI. Children will be randomised to either ofatumumab or rituximab infusion. After infusion of either antibody, steroids will be maintained for 30 days and then tapered off by 0.3 mg/kg/week until complete withdrawal. 1 week after complete steroid withdrawal, CNI will be decreased by 50% and withdrawn within 2 additional weeks. We will enrol 140 children to detect as significant at the 2-sided p value of 0.01 with a power of >0.8, a reduction in the risk of 1-year relapse (primary end point) of at least 0.3 (ie, from 0.65 to 0.35; (risk ratio 0.54)) in the ofatumumab arm when compared with the rituximab arm. We will compare the amount of steroids required to maintain complete disease remission at 6 and 24 months, relapse-free period, relapse rate per year as secondary end points. Circulating cell populations will be studied as biomarkers or predictors of the anti-CD20 response. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial received ethics approval from the local ethics board. We will publish study results and present them at international scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02394119; 2015-000624-28; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Calcineurin InhibitorsSteroidsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdolescentAntibodiesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntigens, CD20Antineoplastic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsNephrotic SyndromeRecurrenceAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAntibodiesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntigens, CD20Antineoplastic AgentsCABIN1 protein, humanCalcineurin InhibitorsImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsofatumumabRituximabSteroids

Identifiers

PMID28314744
PMCPMC5372102
OpenAlexW2595559357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.