ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2017
A Patient and Provider Research Agenda on Diabetes and Hypertension Management.
Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Meaningful engagement of lived experience in diabetes research and health service improvement: A rapid review of barriers to and enablers for community involvement among adults with type 2 diabetes.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Review
- From Insight to Action: A National Patient-Centered Strategic Framework for Improving Reproductive Health Outcomes in Individuals With Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Prioritizing patient-centered research in adult congenital heart disease and pregnancy: Findings from Phase 3 of a multiphase national initiative.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Addressing opioid misuse through community-engaged strategy development: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Review
- Evaluation of a Participatory Action Project to Address Opioid Misuse: Breaking Down Barriers Through Partnership Processes.Gateways : international journal of community research & engagement · 2024Article
- Impacting Community Well-Being Through Effective Engagement Using the SEED Method.Journal of extension · 2024Article
- Multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement in a type 2 diabetes comparative effectiveness study utilizing real-world data.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Bringing Lived Experience to Research on Health and Homelessness: Perspectives of Researchers and Lived Experience Partners.Community mental health journal · 2023Article
- Setting Patient-Centered Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease in Central Appalachia: Engaging Stakeholder Experts to Develop a Research Agenda.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Diabetes-related research priorities of people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in Germany.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A Guide to Selecting Participatory Research Methods Based on Project and Partnership Goals.Journal of participatory research methods · 2022Article
- Engaging with the Richmond Community to Reduce Pediatric Asthma Disparities: Findings from a Community-engaged Needs Assessment.American journal of community psychology · 2020Article
- Participatory Action Planning to Address the Opioid Crisis in a Rural Virginia Community Using the SEED Method.Journal of participatory research methods · 2020Article
- Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE).BMC medical research methodology · 2019Article
- Practice-based research agenda priorities selected by patients: findings from a dental practice-based research network.International dental journal · 2019Article
- A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method.Research involvement and engagement · 2019Article
- Assessing the Impacts and Ripple Effects of a Community-University Partnership: A Retrospective Roadmap.Michigan journal of community service learning · 2019Article
- Does funded research reflect the priorities of people living with type 1 diabetes? A secondary analysis of research questions.BMJ open · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionA demonstration project in Richmond, Virginia involved patients and other stakeholders in the creation of a research agenda on dietary and behavioral management of diabetes and hypertension. Given the impact of these diseases on morbidity and mortality, considerable research has been directed at the challenges patients face in chronic disease management. The continuing need to understand disparities and find evidence-based interventions to improve outcomes has been fruitful, but disparities and unmet needs persist.
methodsThe Stakeholder Engagement in Question Development (SEED) method is a stakeholder engagement methodology that combines engagement with a review of available evidence to generate research questions that address current research gaps and are important to patients and other stakeholders. Using the SEED method, patients and other stakeholders participated in research question development through a combination of collaborative, participatory, and consultative engagement. Steps in the process included: (1) identifying the topic and recruiting participants; (2) conducting focus groups and interviews; (3) developing conceptual models; (4) developing research questions; and (5) prioritizing research questions.
resultsStakeholders were involved in the SEED process from February to August 2015. Eighteen questions were prioritized for inclusion in the research agenda, covering diverse domains, from healthcare provision to social and environmental factors. Data analysis took place September to May 2016. During this time, researchers conducted a literature review to target research gaps.
conclusionsThe stakeholder-prioritized, novel research questions developed through the SEED process can directly inform future research and guide the development of evidence that translates more directly to clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.