Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28314375›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2017

Inter-Subject Variability of Axonal Injury in Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury.

Jeffrey B Ware, Tessa Hart, John Whyte, Amanda Rabinowitz, John A Detre, Junghoon Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neuroimaging of Traumatic Brain Injury.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey B Ware1 Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Tessa Hart2 Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
John Whyte2 Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Amanda Rabinowitz2 Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
John A Detre3 Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Junghoon Kim2 Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Moss Rehabilitation Hospital · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Training and DisseminationP41EB015893 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REDDY, RAVINDER · 2012 to 2019
$11.3M
A Longitudinal Multi-modal Neuroimaging Investigation of Functional Recovery afteR01NS065980 · NINDS · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI KIM, JUNGHOON JOHN · 2011 to 2015
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015893NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of cognitive morbidity worldwide for which reliable biomarkers are needed. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a promising biomarker of traumatic axonal injury (TAI); however, existing studies have been limited by a primary reliance on group-level analytic methods not well suited to account for inter-subject variability. In this study, 42 adults with TBI of at least moderate severity were examined 3 months following injury and compared with 35 healthy controls. DTI data were used for both traditional group-level comparison and subject-specific analysis using the distribution-corrected Z-score (DisCo-Z) approach. Inter-subject variation in TAI was assessed in a threshold-invariant manner using a threshold-weighted overlap map derived from subject-specific analysis. Receiver operator curve analysis was used to examine the ability of subject-specific DTI analysis to identify TBI subjects with significantly impaired processing speed in comparison with region of interest-based fractional anisotropy (FA) measurements and clinical characteristics. Traditional group-wise analysis demonstrated widespread reductions of white matter FA within the TBI group (voxel-wise p < 0.05, corrected), despite relatively low consistency of subject-level effects secondary to widespread variation in the spatial distribution of TAI. Subject-specific mapping of TAI with the DisCo-Z approach was the best predictor of impaired processing speed, achieving high classification accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.94). In moderate-to-severe TBI, there is substantial inter-subject variation in TAI, with extent strongly correlated to post-traumatic deficits in processing speed. Significant group-level effects do not necessarily represent consistent effects at the individual level. Better accounting for inter-subject variability in neurobiological manifestations of TBI may substantially improve the ability to detect and classify patterns of injury.

Indexed as

AdultBrain Injuries, TraumaticCognitive DysfunctionDiffuse Axonal InjuryDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWhite MatterYoung Adultcognitive functiondiffusion tensor imagingtraumatic axonal injurytraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID28314375
PMCPMC5510712
OpenAlexW2611753751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.