ArticlePloS one2017
Automatic ICD-10 coding algorithm using an improved longest common subsequence based on semantic similarity.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digitalising the past decades: automated ICD-10 coding of unstructured free text dermatological diagnoses.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparison of different feature extraction methods for applicable automated ICD coding.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Automatic RadLex coding of Chinese structured radiology reports based on text similarity ensemble.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Automatic multilabel detection of ICD10 codes in Dutch cardiology discharge letters using neural networks.NPJ digital medicine · 2021Article
- Artificial Intelligence Algorithm with ICD Coding Technology Guided by the Embedded Electronic Medical Record System in Medical Record Information Management.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
- Construction of a semi-automatic ICD-10 coding system.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Explainable Prediction of Medical Codes With Knowledge Graphs.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Analysis of disease profile, and medical burden by lead exposure from hospital information systems in China.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Improving the Efficacy of the Data Entry Process for Clinical Research With a Natural Language Processing-Driven Medical Information Extraction System: Quantitative Field Research.JMIR medical informatics · 2019Article
- EHR problem list clustering for improved topic-space navigation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
- Automatic ICD Code Assignment based on ICD's Hierarchy Structure for Chinese Electronic Medical Records.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019Article
- Leveraging Shannon Entropy to Validate the Transition between ICD-10 and ICD-11.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ICD-10(International Classification of Diseases 10th revision) is a classification of a disease, symptom, procedure, or injury. Diseases are often described in patients' medical records with free texts, such as terms, phrases and paraphrases, which differ significantly from those used in ICD-10 classification. This paper presents an improved approach based on the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) and semantic similarity for automatic Chinese diagnoses, mapping from the disease names given by clinician to the disease names in ICD-10. LCS refers to the longest string that is a subsequence of every member of a given set of strings. The proposed method of improved LCS in this paper can increase the accuracy of processing in Chinese disease mapping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.