Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28304306›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2017

The Progression of Alzheimer's Disease: Are Fast Decliners Really Fast? A Four-Year Follow-Up.

Federica Barocco, Marco Spallazzi, Letizia Concari, Simona Gardini, Annalisa Pelosi, Paolo Caffarra

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Federica BaroccoSection of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Marco SpallazziSection of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Letizia ConcariULSS 9, Ca' Foncello Hospital, Treviso, Italy.
Simona GardiniAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma, Italy.
Annalisa PelosiSection of Psychology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Paolo CaffarraSection of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
University of Parma · ITCa' Foncello Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rate of cognitive and functional decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD) changes across individuals.

objectivesOur purpose was to assess whether the concept of "fast decline" really fits its definition and whether cognitive and functional variables at onset can predict the progression of AD.

methods324 AD patients were included. We retrospectively examined their Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) total score and sub-items, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) at baseline and every six months for a 4-year follow-up. Patients were divided into "fast decliners" (n = 62), defined by a loss ≥5 points on the MMSE score within the first year from the baseline; "intermediate decliners" (n = 37), by a loss ≥5 points after the first year and before the 18th month; or "slow decliners" (n = 225), composed of the remaining patients.

resultsAt baseline, the groups did not differ on demographic, clinical, and cognitive variables. The decline at the end of the 4-year follow-up period seems to be similar among the different decline clusters. Predictors of disease progression have not been identified; only the MMSE total score at 12 months <14/30 was indicative of a poor prognosis.

conclusionsEven with the limitation due to the small sample size, the lack of differences in the disease progression in time in the different clusters suggest the inconsistency of the so-called "fast decliners". This study was unable to show any significant difference among clusters of AD progression within a 4-year time interval. Further studies should better clarify whether a more consistent distinction exists between slow and fast decliners.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseAnalysis of VarianceCognition DisordersFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesROC CurveTime FactorsAlzheimer’s diseasecognitive predictorsdementia progressionfast declinersMini-Mental State Examination

Identifiers

PMID28304306
PMCPMC5389047
OpenAlexW2607026596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.