Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28304262›Full record

ArticleResearch and theory for nursing practice2016

Lung Cancer Screening Participation: Developing a Conceptual Model to Guide Research.

Lisa Carter-Harris, Lorie L Davis, Susan M Rawl

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and theory for nursing practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05824273 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Leveraging Social Media to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Awareness, Knowledge and Uptake in High-Risk Populations

TypeinterventionalSponsorHackensack Meridian HealthRan2023 to 2024Enrolled512ConditionsLung CancerArmsLungTalk, Non-tailored intervention - Standard of practice
NCT06605534 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

LEAD Pilot Study: Leveraging the Emergency Department to Address SDOH and Reduce Lung Cancer Screening Disparities

TypeinterventionalSponsorHackensack Meridian HealthRan2024 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsLung CancerArmsLungTalk, Non-tailored lung screening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Knowledge translation strategies to enhance lung cancer screening programme implementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Health Beliefs and Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening in a Diverse Safety-Net Population.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Factors associated with lung cancer risk factor documentation.The American journal of managed care · 2023
    Observational
  18. Using Community Health Advisors to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Awareness in the Black Belt: a Pilot Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa Carter-HarrisIndiana University School of Nursing, USA.
Lorie L Davis
Susan M Rawl

Funding

INDIANA UNIVERSITY: TRAINING IN BEHAVIORAL NURSINGT32NR007066 · NINR · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI RAWL, SUSAN M · 1990 to 2017
$4.2M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the development of a conceptual model to guide research focused on lung cancer screening participation from the perspective of the individual in the decision-making process.

methodsBased on a comprehensive review of empirical and theoretical literature, a conceptual model was developed linking key psychological variables (stigma, medical mistrust, fatalism, worry, and fear) to the health belief model and precaution adoption process model.

resultsProposed model concepts have been examined in prior research of either lung or other cancer screening behavior. To date, a few studies have explored a limited number of variables that influence screening behavior in lung cancer specifically. Therefore, relationships among concepts in the model have been proposed and future research directions presented.

conclusionThis proposed model is an initial step to support theoretically based research. As lung cancer screening becomes more widely implemented, it is critical to theoretically guide research to understand variables that may be associated with lung cancer screening participation. Findings from future research guided by the proposed conceptual model can be used to refine the model and inform tailored intervention development.

Indexed as

Decision MakingModels, NursingNursing ResearchEarly Detection of CancerHumansLung NeoplasmsMass Screening

Identifiers

PMID28304262
PMCPMC5553010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.