Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28303888›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

DNA methylation signatures in peripheral blood strongly predict all-cause mortality.

Yan Zhang, Rory Wilson, Jonathan Heiss, Lutz P Breitling, Kai-Uwe Saum, Ben Schöttker, Bernd Holleczek, Melanie Waldenberger, Annette Peters, Hermann Brenner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 241 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
241citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

241 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 390 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

181 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yan ZhangDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Research Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9913-6490
Rory WilsonResearch Unit of Molecular Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Center for Environmental Health, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Jonathan HeissDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Research Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Lutz P BreitlingDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Research Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Kai-Uwe SaumDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Research Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ben SchöttkerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Research Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Bernd HolleczekSaarland Cancer Registry, Präsident Baltz Strasse 5, D-66119 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Melanie WaldenbergerResearch Unit of Molecular Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Center for Environmental Health, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Annette PetersResearch Unit of Molecular Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Center for Environmental Health, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Hermann BrennerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Research Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEKrebsregister Saarland · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation (DNAm) has been revealed to play a role in various diseases. Here we performed epigenome-wide screening and validation to identify mortality-related DNAm signatures in a general population-based cohort with up to 14 years follow-up. In the discovery panel in a case-cohort approach, 11,063 CpGs reach genome-wide significance (FDR<0.05). 58 CpGs, mapping to 38 well-known disease-related genes and 14 intergenic regions, are confirmed in a validation panel. A mortality risk score based on ten selected CpGs exhibits strong association with all-cause mortality, showing hazard ratios (95% CI) of 2.16 (1.10-4.24), 3.42 (1.81-6.46) and 7.36 (3.69-14.68), respectively, for participants with scores of 1, 2-5 and 5+ compared with a score of 0. These associations are confirmed in an independent cohort and are independent from the 'epigenetic clock'. In conclusion, DNAm of multiple disease-related genes are strongly linked to mortality outcomes. The DNAm-based risk score might be informative for risk assessment and stratification.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticMortalityAgedCardiovascular DiseasesCause of DeathCohort StudiesCpG IslandsDiabetes MellitusDNA MethylationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID28303888
PMCPMC5357865
OpenAlexW2596440417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.