Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28303774›Full record

ArticleDisaster medicine and public health preparedness2017

Physiological Evaluation of Personal Protective Ensembles Recommended for Use in West Africa.

Aitor Coca, Tyler Quinn, Jung-Hyun Kim, Tianzhou Wu, Jeff Powell, Raymond Roberge, Ronald Shaffer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aitor CocaNational Personal Protective Technology Laboratory of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.
Tyler QuinnNational Personal Protective Technology Laboratory of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.
Jung-Hyun KimNational Personal Protective Technology Laboratory of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.
Tianzhou WuNational Personal Protective Technology Laboratory of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.
Jeff PowellNational Personal Protective Technology Laboratory of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.
Raymond RobergeNational Personal Protective Technology Laboratory of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.
Ronald ShafferNational Personal Protective Technology Laboratory of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePersonal protective equipment (PPE) provides health care workers with a barrier to prevent human contact with viruses like Ebola and potential transmission of the disease. However, PPE can also introduce an additional physiological burden from potentially increased heat stress. This study evaluated the human physiological and subjective responses to continuous light exercise within environmental conditions similar to those in West Africa while wearing 3 different, commonly used PPE ensembles (E1, E2, and E3).

methodsSix healthy individuals were tested in an environmental chamber (32°C, 92% relative humidity) while walking (3 METs, 2.5 mph, 0% incline) on a treadmill for 60 minutes. All subjects wore medical scrubs and PPE items. E1 also had a face shield and fluid-resistant surgical gown; E2 additionally included goggles, coverall, and separate hood; and E3 also contained a highly impermeable coverall, separate hood, and surgical mask cover over the N95 respirator.

resultsHeart rate and core temperature at the end of the exercise were significantly higher for E2 and E3 than for E1. Subjective perceptions of heat and exertion were significantly higher for E2 and E3 than for E1.

conclusionsHeat stress and PPE training, as well as the implementation of a work-to-rest ratio that avoids dehydration and possible heat stress issues, are recommended. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2017;11:580-586).

Indexed as

AdultAfrica, WesternBody Mass IndexBody TemperatureDehydrationEquipment DesignHeart RateHumansMalePersonal Protective Equipmentcore temperatureEbolaheat stresspersonal protective equipment ensembles

Identifiers

PMID28303774
PMCPMC9901493
OpenAlexW2596246382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.