Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28303726›Full record

Trial reportJournal of diabetes science and technology2017

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Variability of Insulin When Administered by Jet Injection.

Elsemiek E C Engwerda, Cees J Tack, Bastiaan E de Galan

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advances in transdermal insulin delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2019
    Review
  7. Modeling the acute effects of exercise on insulin kinetics in type 1 diabetes.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elsemiek E C Engwerda1 Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Cees J Tack1 Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Bastiaan E de Galan1 Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJet injection has been shown to accelerate the absorption and action of rapid-acting insulin. In this study, we compared the variability of absorption characteristics between jet injection and conventional administration of the rapid-acting insulin analogue aspart.

methodsA total of 30 healthy volunteers were enrolled in this randomized controlled blinded parallel study. On two test days, they received insulin aspart (0.2 units/kg body weight), either by jet injection or conventional pen, followed by a 6-hour euglycemic glucose clamp. Plasma glucose and insulin levels and glucose infusion rates were measured every 5 to 10 minutes to calculate the variability in pharmacological endpoints.

resultsJet injection advanced the times until maximal insulin concentration (T-INS

Indexed as

Double-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInjections, JetInsulin AspartMaleYoung AdultHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin Aspartdiabetes mellitusinsulin aspartjet injectorpharmacodynamicspharmacokineticsvariability

Identifiers

PMID28303726
PMCPMC5950987
OpenAlexW2595266858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.