Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28303503›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2017

Outcomes of Omega Loop Gastric Bypass, 6-Years Experience of 1520 Cases.

Osama Taha, Mahmoud Abdelaal, Mohamed Abozeid, Awny Askalany, Mohamed Alaa

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04613635 (Comparison of 2 Suture Materials for Closure of Ventral Defect at the Gastrojejunostomy in One-Anastomosis-Gastric Bypass / Mini-Gastric Bypass), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04613635 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of 2 Suture Materials for Closure of Ventral Defect at the Gastrojejunostomy in One-Anastomosis-Gastric Bypass / Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB / MGB): a Randomized Short Term Study With Monocrylic Spiral Knotless Tissue Control Device vs. Traditional Polyglactin Multifilament Suture

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Franziskus HospitalRan2020 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsMorbid Obesity, Anastomotic Leak, Anastomotic Stenosis, Hemorrhage PostoperativeArmsStratafix, Vicryl
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Long-Term Comparative Study Between One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Osama TahaPlastic and Obesity Surgery Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt.
Mahmoud AbdelaalPlastic and Obesity Surgery Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt. mahmoud.abdel-aal@ucdconnect.ie.ORCID 0000-0002-3570-4812
Mohamed AbozeidOverweight Clinics, Cairo, Egypt.
Awny AskalanyPlastic and Obesity Surgery Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt.
Mohamed AlaaOverweight Clinics, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOmega loop gastric bypass (OLGB) has been viewed with skepticism after the failure of the "old Mason loop." During the past 15 years, a growing number of authors worldwide approved that OLGB is a safe and effective procedure, which appears clearly from the operative outcome and long-term follow-up of consecutive cohort studies of patients who underwent OLGB. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of OLGB at the bariatric center of our university hospital between 2009 and 2015.

methodsThe data of 1520 patients who underwent OLGB from November 2009 to December 2015 at our center were reviewed. Mean age was 37.15 years, mean preoperative BMI was 46.8 ± 6.6 kg/m

resultsThe 1-year postoperative BMI mean decreased to 29.6 ± 3.1 kg/m

conclusionsIn this study, greater excess weight loss was observed with OLGB which appeared to be a short, simple, low-risk, effective, and durable bariatric procedure.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastric BypassHospitals, UniversityHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsReoperationTreatment OutcomeWeight LossYoung AdultMini gastric bypassObesityOmega loop gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID28303503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.