ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2017
Auditory Enhancement in Cochlear-Implant Users Under Simultaneous and Forward Masking.
Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling auditory enhancement: Efferent control of cochlear gain can explain level dependence and effects of hearing loss.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2026Article
- Auditory enhancement in younger and older listeners with normal and impaired hearinga).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
- Spectral contrast effects and auditory enhancement under normal and impaired hearing.Acoustical science and technology · 2020Article
- Auditory enhancement under forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Spectral contrast effects produced by competing speech contexts.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2018Article
- Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
- Auditory enhancement under simultaneous masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Auditory enhancement is the phenomenon whereby the salience or detectability of a target sound within a masker is enhanced by the prior presentation of the masker alone. Enhancement has been demonstrated using both simultaneous and forward masking in normal-hearing listeners and may play an important role in auditory and speech perception within complex and time-varying acoustic environments. The few studies of enhancement in hearing-impaired listeners have reported reduced or absent enhancement effects under forward masking, suggesting a potentially peripheral locus of the effect. Here, auditory enhancement was measured in eight cochlear-implant (CI) users with direct stimulation. Masked thresholds were measured under simultaneous and forward masking as a function of the number of masking electrodes, and the electrode spacing between the maskers and the target. Evidence for auditory enhancement was obtained under simultaneous masking, qualitatively consistent with results from normal-hearing listeners. However, no significant enhancement was observed under forward masking, in contrast to earlier results with normal-hearing listeners. The results suggest that the normal effects of auditory enhancement are partially but not fully experienced by CI users. To the extent that the CI users' results differ from normal, it may be possible to apply signal processing to restore the missing aspects of enhancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.