Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28303240›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2017

Ensuring Privacy When Integrating Patient-Based Datasets: New Methods and Developments in Record Linkage.

Adrian P Brown, Anna M Ferrante, Sean M Randall, James H Boyd, James B Semmens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Population Data Centre Profiles: Centre for Data Linkage.International journal of population data science · 2020
    Article
  12. Using Security Questions to Link Participants in Longitudinal Data Collection.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2020
    Article
  13. A Profile of the SAIL Databank on the UK Secure Research Platform.International journal of population data science · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adrian P BrownCentre for Population Health Research, Curtin University , Bentley, WA , Australia.
Anna M FerranteCentre for Population Health Research, Curtin University , Bentley, WA , Australia.
Sean M RandallCentre for Population Health Research, Curtin University , Bentley, WA , Australia.
James H BoydCentre for Population Health Research, Curtin University , Bentley, WA , Australia.
James B SemmensCentre for Population Health Research, Curtin University , Bentley, WA , Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an era where the volume of structured and unstructured digital data has exploded, there has been an enormous growth in the creation of data about individuals that can be used for understanding and treating disease. Joining these records together at an individual level provides a complete picture of a patient's interaction with health services and allows better assessment of patient outcomes and effectiveness of treatment and services. Record linkage techniques provide an efficient and cost-effective method to bring individual records together as patient profiles. These linkage procedures bring their own challenges, especially relating to the protection of privacy. The development and implementation of record linkage systems that do not require the release of personal information can reduce the risks associated with record linkage and overcome legal barriers to data sharing. Current conceptual and experimental privacy-preserving record linkage (PPRL) models show promise in addressing data integration challenges. Enhancing and operationalizing PPRL protocols can help address the dilemma faced by some custodians between using data to improve quality of life and dealing with the ethical, legal, and administrative issues associated with protecting an individual's privacy. These methods can reduce the risk to privacy, as they do not require personally identifying information to be shared. PPRL methods can improve the delivery of record linkage services to the health and broader research community.

Indexed as

data integrationdata qualityencryptionlinkage qualityprivacyrecord linkage

Identifiers

PMID28303240
PMCPMC5332360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.