Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28303019›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2017

Integration of optogenetics with complementary methodologies in systems neuroscience.

Christina K Kim, Avishek Adhikari, Karl Deisseroth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 344 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
344citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

344 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Optogenetic fMRI for Brain-Wide Circuit Analysis of Sensory Processing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Importance of Synchrony in the Neural Control of Movement.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Intrinsic space-time couplings governing multi-scale cortical dynamics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

284 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christina K KimNeurosciences Program, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Avishek AdhikariDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, 443 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Karl DeisserothDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, 443 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, USA.

Funding

CLARITY: fully-assembled biologyR01MH099647 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DEISSEROTH, KARL A. · 2012 to 2016
$23.0M
OPTICAL NEUROMODULATION TECHNOLOGY FOR LONG TIMESCALESR01MH086373 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DEISSEROTH, KARL A. · 2010 to 2025
$9.1M
Channel Structure-Based Tools for Precise Interrogation of Circuitry and BehaviorR37MH075957 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DEISSEROTH, KARL A. · 2013 to 2022
$7.3M
Structural and molecular identification of circuitry underlying joint processing of motivation and aversionR37DA035377 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DEISSEROTH, KARL A. · 2013 to 2022
$6.2M
Calcium channels, newborn neurons, and CNS circuit dynamicsR01DA020794 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DEISSEROTH, KARL A. · 2005 to 2014
$4.1M
Technology development for fast optical interrogation of living neural circuitryR01MH075957 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DEISSEROTH, KARL A. · 2008 to 2012
$2.6M
Dissection of the anxiety suppression circuitryR00MH106649 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ADHIKARI, AVISHEK · 2017 to 2019
$747k
Dissection of the anxiety suppression circuitryK99MH106649 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ADHIKARI, AVISHEK · 2015 to 2016
$227k
Top-down regulation of compulsive reward-seeking behavior by medial prefrontal cortexF31DA041795 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, CHRISTINA · 2016 to 2017
$52k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDA NIH HHS F31 DA041795NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020794NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA035377NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH106649NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH106649NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH075957NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086373NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH099647NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH075957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern optogenetics can be tuned to evoke activity that corresponds to naturally occurring local or global activity in timing, magnitude or individual-cell patterning. This outcome has been facilitated not only by the development of core features of optogenetics over the past 10 years (microbial-opsin variants, opsin-targeting strategies and light-targeting devices) but also by the recent integration of optogenetics with complementary technologies, spanning electrophysiology, activity imaging and anatomical methods for structural and molecular analysis. This integrated approach now supports optogenetic identification of the native, necessary and sufficient causal underpinnings of physiology and behaviour on acute or chronic timescales and across cellular, circuit-level or brain-wide spatial scales.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectrophysiologyNeuroanatomyNeuroimagingNeurosciencesOptogenetics

Identifiers

PMID28303019
PMCPMC5708544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.