Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28302597›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2017

mHealth Interventions for Health System Strengthening in China: A Systematic Review.

Maoyi Tian, Jing Zhang, Rong Luo, Shi Chen, Djordje Petrovic, Julie Redfern, Dong Roman Xu, Anushka Patel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. mHealth as a health system strengthening tool in China.International journal of nursing sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Maoyi TianThe George Institute for Global Health at Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5660-8571
Jing ZhangThe George Institute for Global Health at Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4727-3754
Rong LuoThe George Institute for Global Health at Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2725-9939
Shi ChenSchool of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7588-7142
Djordje PetrovicMedical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8964-0829
Julie RedfernSydney Medical School, The George Institute for Global Health, Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8707-5563
Dong Roman XuSun Yat-sen Global Health Institute, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7438-632X
Anushka PatelSydney Medical School, The George Institute for Global Health, Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3825-4092
Peking University · CNThe University of Sydney · AUSun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith rapidly expanding infrastructure in China, mobile technology has been deemed to have the potential to revolutionize health care delivery. There is particular promise for mobile health (mHealth) to positively influence health system reform and confront the new challenges of chronic diseases.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to systematically review existing mHealth initiatives in China, characterize them, and examine the extent to which mHealth contributes toward the health system strengthening in China. Furthermore, we also aimed to identify gaps in mHealth development and evaluation.

methodsWe systematically reviewed the literature from English and Chinese electronic database and trial registries, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, China National Knowledge of Infrastructure (CNKI), and World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. We used the English keywords of mHealth, eHealth, telemedicine, telehealth, mobile phone, cell phone, text messaging, and China, as well as their corresponding Chinese keywords. All articles using mobile technology for health care management were included in the study.

resultsA total of 1704 articles were found using the search terms, and eventually 72 were included. Overall, few high quality interventions were identified. Most interventions were found to be insufficient in scope, and their evaluation was of inadequate rigor to generate scalable solutions and provide reliable evidence of effectiveness. Most interventions focused on text messaging for consumer education and behavior change. There were a limited number of interventions that addressed health information management, health workforce issues, use of medicines and technologies, or leadership and governance from a health system perspective.

conclusionsWe provide four recommendations for future mHealth interventions in China that include the need for the development, evaluation and trials examining integrated mHealth interventions to guide the development of future mHealth interventions, target disadvantaged populations with mHealth interventions, and generate appropriate evidence for scalable and sustainable models of care.

Indexed as

Chinahealth care systemsmHealth

Identifiers

PMID28302597
PMCPMC5374274
OpenAlexW2596916116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.