ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2017
[Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Lung: Report of 29 Cases].
Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma transforming to mucoepidermoid carcinoma in a 45-year-old female: a case report.AME case reports · 2026Article
- Pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma in the Chinese population: A clinical characteristic and prognostic analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Pulmonary Salivary Gland Tumor, Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: A Literature Review.Journal of oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is an extremely rare pulmonary malignant tumor, its clinical features and conditions of prognosis is not entirely clear. The aim of this study is to discuss clinical features, diagnostic and therapeutic methods, and prognosis of pulmonary MEC.
methodsWe retrospectively studied 29 pulmonary MEC patients who diagnosed from January 2006 to December 2015 in Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. The clinical features, prognosis, diagnostic and therapeutic methods were analyzed.
resultsThere were 20 patients identified as pulmonary MEC, which constitutes 0.18% of all the lung tumor patients. There were 18 males and 11 females, the median age of the patients was 45 years (range 10-79). There were 17 patients identified as high-grade pulmonary MEC and 12 low-grade. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation detection was performed in six patients, none was positive. 17 cases was underwent surgery based comprehensive treatment, 12 cases non-operatived treatment. The median follow-up time was 35 (5-114) months in this cohort of 29 patients. During the follow up, incidence of death was found in 17 cases. The overall 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 65.5%, 51.2%, 39.4%, respectively. The median survival time was 37 months.
conclusionsThe incidence of pulmonary MEC is low, lacking specific clinical characterization. The diagnosis mainly depends on postoperative pathology, aided by immunohistochemical. Surgery is the main treatment method. The majority of pathology was high-grade type. The prognosis of pulmonary MEC closely relates to the pathological types and clinical stage. EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) is expected to improve the prognosis of pulmonary MEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.