Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28302148›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2017

Thermal quantitative sensory testing in healthy Dutch children and adolescents standardized test paradigm and Dutch reference values.

Gerbrich E van den Bosch, Monique van Dijk, Dick Tibboel, Abraham J Valkenburg

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Current View of Diagnosing Small Fiber Neuropathy.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. TRPM2 and warmth sensation.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gerbrich E van den BoschIntensive Care and department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Room number SK-3284, PO Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. g.vandenbosch@erasmusmc.nl.
Monique van DijkIntensive Care and department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Room number SK-3284, PO Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dick TibboelIntensive Care and department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Room number SK-3284, PO Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Abraham J ValkenburgIntensive Care and department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Room number SK-3284, PO Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantitative sensory testing (QST) is often used to measure children's and adults' detection- and pain thresholds in a quantitative manner. In children especially the Thermal Sensory Analyzer (TSA-II) is often applied to determine thermal detection and pain thresholds. As comparisons between studies are hampered by the different testing protocols used, we aimed to present a standard protocol and reference values for thermal detection- and pain thresholds in children.

methodsOur standard testing protocol includes reaction time dependent and independent tests and takes about 14-18 min to complete. Reference values were obtained from a sample of 69 healthy term born children and adolescents with a median age of 11.2 years (range 8.2 to 17.9 years old). Seventy-one children were recruited and data of 28 males and 41 females was obtained correctly. We studied possible age and sex differences.

resultsThis study provides Dutch reference values and presents a standard quantitative sensory testing protocol for children with an age from 8 years onwards. This protocol appeared to be feasible, since only two out of 71 participants were not able to correctly complete the protocol due to attention deficits and were therefore excluded. We found some significant age and sex differences: females were statistically significantly more sensitive for both cold and heat pain compared to males, and the youngest children (8-9 years old) were less sensitive to detect a warm stimulus. The youngest children tend to be more sensitive to heat pain in comparison to older participants, although the difference was not statistically significant.

conclusionsWe present a feasible thermal quantitative sensory testing protocol for children and reference values that are easy to interpret and may serve as normative values for future studies.

Indexed as

Pain ThresholdAdolescentAge FactorsChildClinical ProtocolsFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleNetherlandsPain MeasurementReaction TimeReference ValuesSex FactorsChildrenPainProtocolQuantitative sensory testingReference values

Identifiers

PMID28302148
PMCPMC5356312
OpenAlexW2596877005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.