ArticleBMC biotechnology2017
A restriction-free method for gene reconstitution using two single-primer PCRs in parallel to generate compatible cohesive ends.
Article in BMC biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Restriction-Free Cloning Approach for Molecular Engineering of Plasmids.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Production of CFTR Mutant Gene Model by Homologous Recombination System.Cell journal · 2022Article
- AdenoBuilder: A platform for the modular assembly of recombinant adenoviruses.STAR protocols · 2022Article
- Differentially Marked IncP-1β R751 Plasmids for Cloning via Recombineering and Conjugation.Polish journal of microbiology · 2019Article
- Efficient strategy for introducing large and multiple changes in plasmid DNA.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- AFEAP cloning: a precise and efficient method for large DNA sequence assembly.BMC biotechnology · 2017Article
- Cdk1-interacting protein Cip1 is regulated by the S phase checkpoint in response to genotoxic stress.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRestriction-free (RF) cloning, a PCR-based method for the creation of custom DNA plasmids, allows for the insertion of any sequence into any plasmid vector at any desired position, independent of restriction sites and/or ligation. Here, we describe a simple and fast method for performing gene reconstitution by modified RF cloning.
resultsDouble-stranded inserts and acceptors were first amplified by regular PCR. The amplified fragments were then used as the templates in two separate linear amplification reactions containing either forward or reverse primer to generate two single-strand reverse-complement counterparts, which could anneal to each other. The annealed inserts and acceptors with 5' and 3' cohesive ends were sealed by ligation reaction. Using this method, we made 46 constructs containing insertions of up to 20 kb. The average cloning efficiency was higher than 85%, as confirmed by colony PCR and sequencing of the inserts.
conclusionsOur method provides an alternative cloning method capable of inserting any DNA fragment of up to at least 20 kb into a plasmid, with high efficiency. This new method does not require restriction sites or alterations of the plasmid or the gene of interest, or additional treatments. The simplicity of both primer design and the procedure itself makes the method suitable for high-throughput cloning and structural genomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.