Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28302054›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2017

The feasibility of matching on a propensity score for acupuncture in a prospective cohort study of patients with chronic pain.

Eric S Johnson, John F Dickerson, William M Vollmer, Alee M Rowley, Cheryl Ritenbaugh, Richard A Deyo, Lynn DeBar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Whole Systems Research Methods in Health Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eric S JohnsonThe Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227-1099, USA. Eric.S.Johnson@kpchr.org.
John F DickersonThe Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227-1099, USA.
William M VollmerThe Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227-1099, USA.
Alee M RowleyThe Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227-1099, USA.
Cheryl RitenbaughDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Arizona, 1450 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.
Richard A DeyoDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Mail Code FM, 3181 Sam Jackson Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Lynn DeBarThe Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227-1099, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Use of Acupuncture for Chronic Pain within an Integrated Health PlanR01AT005896 · NCCIH · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DEBAR, LYNN L. · 2010 to 2014
$3.5M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT005896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPropensity scores are typically applied in retrospective cohort studies. We describe the feasibility of matching on a propensity score derived from a retrospective cohort and subsequently applied in a prospective cohort study of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain before the start of acupuncture or usual care treatment and enrollment in a comparative effectiveness study that required patient reported pain outcomes.

methodsWe assembled a retrospective cohort study using data from 2010 to develop a propensity score for acupuncture versus usual care based on electronic healthcare record and administrative data (e.g., pharmacy) from an integrated health plan, Kaiser Permanente Northwest. The propensity score's probabilities allowed us to match acupuncture-referred and non-referred patients prospectively in 2013-14 after a routine outpatient visit for pain. Among the matched patients, we collected patient-reported pain before treatment and during follow-up to assess the comparative effectiveness of acupuncture. We assessed balance in patient characteristics with the post-matching c-statistic and standardized differences.

resultsBased on the propensity score and other characteristics (e.g., patient-reported pain), we were able to match all 173 acupuncture-referred patients to 350 non-referred (usual care) patients. We observed a residual imbalance (based on the standardized differences) for some characteristics that contributed to the score; for example, age, -0.283, and the Charlson comorbidity score, -0.264, had the largest standardized differences. The overall balance of the propensity score appeared more favorable according to the post-matching c-statistic, 0.503.

conclusionThe propensity score matching was feasible statistically and logistically and allowed approximate balance on patient characteristics, some of which will require adjustment in the comparative effectiveness regression model. By transporting propensity scores to new patients, healthcare systems with electronic health records can conduct comparative effectiveness cohort studies that require prospective data collection, such as patient-reported outcomes, while approximately balancing numerous patient characteristics that might confound the benefit of an intervention. The approach offers a new study design option.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreAcupuncture TherapyChronic PainElectronic Health RecordsHumansInsurance, HealthMusculoskeletal PainProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAcupunctureComparative effectivenessPainPropensity scoreProspective cohort

Identifiers

PMID28302054
PMCPMC5356308
OpenAlexW2595435938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.