Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28301696›Full record

ArticleThe Hastings Center report2017

Toward an Ethically Sensitive Implementation of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in the Global Context.

Jessica Mozersky, Vardit Ravitsky, Rayna Rapp, Marsha Michie, Subhashini Chandrasekharan, Megan Allyse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Hastings Center report, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Seeing Beyond the Margins: Challenges to Informed Inclusion of Vulnerable Populations in Research.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica Mozersky
Vardit Ravitsky
Rayna Rapp
Marsha Michie
Subhashini Chandrasekharan
Megan Allyse

Funding

Intellectual Property and Access to Noninvasive Prenatal Genetic TestingR01HG007074 · NHGRI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHANDRASEKHARAN, SUBHASHINI · 2013 to 2015
$1.1M
Mapping an ELSI-integrated translational pathway with cell-free fetal DNA testingR00HG006452 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MICHIE, MARSHA MABRY · 2014 to 2016
$747k
NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG006452NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA, which analyzes placental DNA circulating in maternal blood to provide information about fetal chromosomal disorders early in pregnancy and without risk to the fetus, has been hailed as a potential "paradigm shift" in prenatal genetic screening. Commercial provision of cell-free DNA screening has contributed to a rapid expansion of the tests included in the screening panels. The tests can include screening for sex chromosome anomalies, rare subchromosomal microdeletions and aneuploidies, and most recently, the entire fetal genome. The benefits of this screening tool are generally framed, by both providers and commercial laboratories, as enhancing reproductive autonomy and choice by providing an earlier, simpler, and more accurate screening while potentially reducing the need for invasive follow-up testing. The majority of the literature has explored these issues empirically or conceptually from a European or North American vantage point, one that assumes normative priorities such as individual reproductive autonomy and the clinical availability of maternal health care or prenatal screening programs within which cell-free DNA screening is offered. While its implementation has raised both challenges and opportunities, very little is known about real-world experiences and the implications of the rapid introduction of cell-free DNA screening outside of North America and Europe, especially in low- and middle-income countries. To begin addressing this gap in knowledge, we organized a four-day international workshop to explore the ethical, legal, social, economic, clinical, and practical implications of the global expansion of cell-free DNA screening. We describe eight key insights that arose from the workshop.

Indexed as

Decision MakingGenetic TestingGlobal HealthHumansPersonal AutonomyPrenatal DiagnosisSex PreselectionSocioeconomic FactorsWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID28301696
PMCPMC5568559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.