Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28301645›Full record

ArticleJAMA facial plastic surgery2017

Association of Face-lift Surgery With Social Perception, Age, Attractiveness, Health, and Success.

Jason C Nellis, Masaru Ishii, Ira D Papel, Theda C Kontis, Patrick J Byrne, Kofi D O Boahene, Kristin L Bater, Lisa E Ishii

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA facial plastic surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sex Differences in Physical Attractiveness Investments: Overlooked Side of Masculinity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason C NellisDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Masaru IshiiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ira D PapelDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Theda C KontisDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Patrick J ByrneDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kofi D O BoaheneDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kristin L BaterDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lisa E IshiiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN OTOLARYNGOLOGYT32DC000027 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAREY, JOHN PATRICK · 1989 to 2023
$5.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceEvidence quantifying the influence of face-lift surgery on societal perceptions is lacking.

objectiveTo measure the association of face-lift surgery with observer-graded perceived age, attractiveness, success, and overall health. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsIn a web-based survey, 526 casual observers naive to the purpose of the study viewed independent images of 13 unique female patient faces before or after face-lift surgery from January 1, 2016, through June 30, 2016. The Delphi method was used to select standardized patient images confirming appropriate patient candidacy and overall surgical effect. Observers estimated age and rated the attractiveness, perceived success, and perceived overall health for each patient image. Facial perception questions were answered on a visual analog scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores corresponding to more positive responses. To evaluate the accuracy of observer age estimation, the patients' preoperative estimated mean age was compared with the patients' actual mean age. A multivariate mixed-effects regression model was used to determine the effect of face-lift surgery. To further characterize the effect of face-lift surgery, estimated ordinal-rank change was calculated for each domain. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Blinded casual observer ratings of patients estimated age, attractiveness, perceived success, and perceived overall health.

resultsA total of 483 observers (mean [SD] age, 29 [8.6] years; 382 women [79.4%]) successfully completed the survey. Comparing patients' preoperative estimated mean (SD) age (59.6 [9.0] years) and patients' actual mean (SD) age (58.4 [6.9] years) revealed no significant difference (t2662 = -0.47; 95% CI, -6.07 to 3.72; P = .64). On multivariate regression, patients after face-lift surgery were rated as significantly younger (coefficient, -3.69; 95% CI -4.15 to -3.23; P < .001), more attractive (coefficient, 8.21; 95% CI, 7.41-9.02; P < .001), more successful (coefficient, 5.82; 95% CI, 5.05 to 6.59; P < .001), and overall healthier (coefficient, 8.72; 95% CI, 7.88-9.56; P < .001). The ordinal rank changes for an average individual were -21 for perceived age, 21 for attractiveness, 16 for success, and 21 for overall health. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, observer perceptions of face-lift surgery were associated with views that patients appeared younger, more attractive, healthier, and more successful. These findings highlight observer perceptions of face-lift surgery that could positively influence social interactions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.

Indexed as

AchievementAssociationAttitude to HealthBeautyFacial RecognitionSocial PerceptionAdolescentAdultAgedAgingDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate Analysis

Identifiers

PMID28301645
PMCPMC5519425
OpenAlexW2594985410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.