Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28301591›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

In vivo and ex vivo cetuximab sensitivity assay using three-dimensional primary culture system to stratify KRAS mutant colorectal cancer.

Takahiro Tashiro, Hiroaki Okuyama, Hiroko Endo, Kenji Kawada, Yasuko Ashida, Masayuki Ohue, Yoshiharu Sakai, Masahiro Inoue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical significance of non-invasive in vitro drug sensitivity profiling using pancreatic cancer organoids derived from saline flushes collected during routine EUS-FNA.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reconstructing the tumor architecture into organoids.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takahiro TashiroDepartment of Biochemistry, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroaki OkuyamaDepartment of Biochemistry, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroko EndoDepartment of Biochemistry, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Kenji KawadaDepartmet of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Yasuko AshidaCharles River Laboratories Japan, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masayuki OhueDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshiharu SakaiDepartmet of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Masahiro InoueDepartment of Biochemistry, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JPKyoto University · JPMedical & Biological Laboratories (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinic, cetuximab, an anti-EGFR antibody, improves treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC). KRAS-mutant CRC is generally resistant to cetuximab, although difference of the sensitivity among KRAS-mutants has not been studied in detail. We previously developed the cancer tissue-originated spheroid (CTOS) method, a primary culture method for cancer cells. We applied CTOS method to investigate whether ex vivo cetuximab sensitivity assays reflect the difference in sensitivity in the xenografts. Firstly, in vivo cetuximab treatment was performed with xenografts derived from 10 CTOS lines (3 KRAS-wildtype and 7 KRAS mutants). All two CTOS lines which exhibited tumor regression were KRAS-wildtype, meanwhile all KRAS-mutant CTOS lines grew more than the initial size: were resistant to cetuximab according to the clinical evaluation criteria, although the sensitivity was quite diverse. We divided KRAS-mutants into two groups; partially responsive group in which cetuximab had a substantial growth inhibitory effect, and resistant group which exhibited no effect. The ex vivo signaling assay with EGF stimulation revealed that the partially responsive group, but not the resistant group, exhibited suppressed ERK phosphorylation ex vivo. Furthermore, two lines from the partially responsive group, but none of the lines in the resistant group, exhibited a combinatory effect of cetuximab and trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, ex vivo and in vivo. Taken together, the results indicate that ex vivo signaling assay reflects the difference in sensitivity in vivo and stratifies KRAS mutant CTOS lines by sensitivity. Therefore, coupling the in vivo and ex vivo assays with CTOS can be a useful platform for understanding the mechanism of diversity in drug sensitivity.

Indexed as

Genes, rasMutationAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCetuximabColorectal NeoplasmsHumansMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximab

Identifiers

PMID28301591
PMCPMC5354432
OpenAlexW2595179843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.